|
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD BHR RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 52MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
74123152 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Biocompatibility (2886)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Synovitis (2094); Arthralgia (2355); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559); Bursitis (4832); High metal ion levels (4847)
|
| Date of Event |
12/15/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
*us legal* it was reported that after a primary left bhr resurfacing surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2018, the patient experienced continued pain.An mri performed on (b)(6) 2018 revealed deep tissue swelling and lateral soft tissue swelling.Patient also had elevated cobalt and chromium levels in blood.The plaintiff¿s surgeon indicated the need for a revision surgery due to metallosis and extensive synovitis.The left hip revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2019 and the hip was replaced to a tha from an unknown manufacturer.Unfortunately, after the revision surgery, the plaintiff kept experiencing several adverse events, requiring 2 additional revision surgeries.The patient currently has left hip pain, chronic dysfunction, soft tissue scarring and mechanical issues due to metallosis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6.It was reported that a revision surgery was performed on the patients left hip.As of today the devices used in treatment have been requested but have not become available.Without definitive lot numbers, a complete complaint history review cannot be performed for the devices involved.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, a manufacturing record review, device labelling and ifu review could not be performed.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.The available medical information was reviewed.Based on the reported symptoms it cannot be concluded that the events/clinical reactions (elevated cobalt and chromium levels, metallosis and extensive synovitis) were associated with a mal-performance of the implant.The patient impact cannot be determined at this time.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the reported complaint.The investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Additionally, specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault cannot be provided due to the insufficient information.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on the results of this investigation, the need for corrective or preventative action is not indicated.Internal reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after a primary left bhr resurfacing surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2018, the patient experienced continued pain.An mri performed on (b)(6) 2018 revealed deep tissue swelling and lateral soft tissue swelling.Patient also had elevated cobalt and chromium levels in blood.The plaintiff¿s surgeon indicated the need for a revision surgery due to metallosis and extensive synovitis.The left hip revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2019 and the hip was replaced to a tha from an unknown manufacturer.Unfortunately, after the revision surgery, the plaintiff kept experiencing several adverse events, requiring 2 additional revision surgeries.The patient currently has left hip pain, chronic dysfunction, soft tissue scarring and mechanical issues due to metallosis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10.Additional information in a2 and b7.H11.Corrected information in a2, b7.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed on the patients left hip.As of today the devices used in treatment have been requested but have not become available.Without definitive lot numbers, a complete complaint history review cannot be performed for the devices involved.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, a manufacturing record review, device labelling and ifu review could not be performed.A risk management review was performed.No additional risks were identified as result of the reported event.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.The available medical information was reviewed.Although the cobalt and chromium were 3.9 and 3.3 g/ml respectively, they are below the standard threshold for recommendations for medical intervention.The revision operative report did not note findings consistent with metallosis.The reported pain is consistent with the muscle strain/sprain, iliopsoas bursitis and/or trochanteric bursitis.The post revision pain, mechanical instability, leg length discrepancy, weakness and subsequent revisions are not related to the s&n implants.The patient impact is determined to be the revision and post-operative convalescence period.Without return of the actual devices or further information we cannot further investigate or confirm the reported complaint.The investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Additionally, specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault cannot be provided due to the insufficient information.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on the results of this investigation, the need for corrective or preventative action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D4: catalog #, lot #, unique identifier (udi) # h4: device manufacture date g5: pma/510(k) # h6: health effect - clinical code and health effect - impact code.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|