|
|
| Catalog Number |
0010105 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abscess (1690); Unspecified Infection (1930); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
11/22/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Device evaluated by manufacturer? not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2011) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b6, d3, d4, d6b, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with ventral and umbilical hernia thereby underwent implant of bard kugel hernia patch.Per op notes, "the patient had a large incarcerated hernia above the umbilicus, with fluid.The incision was extended; an umbilical hernia was also noted.The two hernias combined together created a space of about 7 to 8 cm.A kugel patch was then placed covering both defects and sutured." (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with abscess, infected abdominal wall mesh underwent mesh explantation.Per op notes, "a vertical incision was made on the previous ventral hernia repair, the infected pocket was opened, the old mesh was completely explanted, as it was not incorporated.A site of chronic granulation tissue was present in the umbilical side, along a 1 cm umbilical hernia.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|