• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT; INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT; INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 441916
Medical Device Problem Code False Positive Result (1227)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/17/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported the bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument had two occurrences of false positives.It was determined the false results were due to instrument issues.False results were not reported to clinician or patients.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "false positive results due to bumpy/shaky curves the customer is complaining on false positive results due to bumpy/shaky curves and/or bleeding.They also had some incidences of ind results due to error in result metrics.Therefore our technical service decided to replace the 2 readers in bd max instrument (b)(4).After this action, they are still complaining about false positive results.We discussed this issue internally and after analysing the curves we indeed could see aspecific amplification.Service max cases are in the attached document.Attached you can also find the pdf and csv files of 2 runs no incorrect results were reported to the patient and/or clinician as the customer always look at the curves of positive samples.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: na.Pma / 510(k)#: additional 510k number reported: k130470.A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported the bd max¿ system, bd max¿ instrument had two occurrences of false positives.It was determined the false results were due to instrument issues.False results were not reported to clinician or patients.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "false positive results due to bumpy/shaky curves the customer is complaining on false positive results due to bumpy/shaky curves and/or bleeding.They also had some incidences of ind results due to error in result metrics.Therefore our technical service decided to replace the 2 readers in bd max instrument (b)(6).After this action, they are still complaining about false positive results.We discussed this issue internally and after analysing the curves we indeed could see aspecific amplification.Service max cases are in the attached document.Attached you can also find the pdf and csv files of 2 runs no incorrect results were reported to the patient and/or clinician as the customer always look at the curves of positive samples.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H.6.Investigation: the complaint alleges the bd max instrument (catalog number 441916 and serial number (b)(6)) had a "false positive¿.Customer reported that they are receiving false positive on evp.Field service was dispatched and replaced both readers, but the issue still persist.The case has been escalated and is part of an escalation project to determine the issue.Review of device history record for instrument serial number, (b)(6) is not required because this complaint does not allege an early life failure or a failure at install.Device was installed on (b)(6) 2020, and since then other service activities have occurred, such as preventative maintenance and repair, which have changed the configuration of the instrument since release from manufacturing.Service history review was performed for the instrument (b)(6) and in (b)(6) 2021, the instrument experienced false positives with adv.Reader a was replaced and both readers were normalized.Returned sample analysis consisted of review of database and run files.Review of the run 2440 shows false positive for adv.Review of the raw vic curve shows that slight but small amplification on shaky curve, but review of the background corrected curve for vic shows that the amplification is not proportional with the raw curve and has a linear overshoot at the end.Review of the fam curve shows that raw fam curve follows closely to the vic background corrected curve with the exception of the overshoot at the end.This is made to believe that there is a level of optical crosstalk.Root cause cannot be determined as the source of the cross talk is still being investigated by the engineering team.Complaint is confirmed by quality review of the run file and database.Review of risk management files confirms there are no new, modified, or additional risks associated with this failure mode.Bd quality will continue to monitor trends associated with this failure mode.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, BD MAX¿ INSTRUMENT
Common Device Name
INSTRUMENTATION FOR CLINICAL MULTIPLEX TEST SYSTEMS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key13743954
Report Number1119779-2022-00426
Device Sequence Number4839240
Product Code OOI
UDI-Device Identifier00382904419165
UDI-Public382904419165
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryBE
PMA/510(K) Number
K111860
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Catalogue Number441916
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/17/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/03/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/12/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-