• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH ¿ COMPOSIX L/P; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH ¿ COMPOSIX L/P; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0134113
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 04/17/2008
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2008.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2008.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the composix l/p.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2008 ¿ patient was diagnosed with ventral incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix l/p mesh.Per operative notes, ¿two large ventral incisional hernia defect was identified.A oval shaped composix l/p mesh (device #1) was placed into the abdominal cavity and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2008 ¿ patient was diagnosed with intrabdominal adhesions thereby underwent laparoscopic combined with open repair with partial removal of mesh(device #1).Per operative notes, ¿the adhesions were lysed.The mesh that had incorporated into the ventral hernia sac was excised on both sides.The remaining ventral hernia sac fascia and mesh (device #1) were sutured together.¿ (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with removal of composix l/p mesh (device #1) and an implant of ventrio mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sac and old mesh (device #1) was dissected and excised.A large ventral hernia was identified and adhesions were taken down and ventrio mesh was placed using absorbable tackers and sutures.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MESH ¿ COMPOSIX L/P
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key13759377
Report Number1213643-2022-91966
Device Sequence Number19453118
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031243
UDI-Public(01)00801741031243(10)DARA0018
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K061754
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2008
Device Explanted Year2015
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/07/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number0134113
Device Lot NumberDARA0018
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/03/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/14/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/07/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Disability;
Patient Age39 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-