• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40 STEM 35.5MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH EXETER V40 STEM 35.5MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 0580-1-351
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Loss of Osseointegration (2408)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544)
Date of Event 02/17/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Device not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Revision was planned due to pain in the femoral diaphysis.X-ray showed stem fracture.Patient was not very much active, but loosening was found in the proximal part.Mismatch with the adherent distal part might cause stem fracture.
 
Event or Problem Description
Revision was planned due to pain in the femoral diaphysis.X-ray showed stem fracture.Patient was not very much active, but loosening was found in the proximal part.Mismatch with the adherent distal part might cause stem fracture.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding crack/fracture and loosening involving a exeter stem was reported.The crack/fracture event was confirmed via evaluation of the returned device and review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant.Loosening was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device confirms that the device was fractured.The damage is consistent with fatigue accumulation in the stem ultimately ending in a fatigue fracture of the stem requiring revision.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "this inquiry concerns a case of a patient who underwent a cemented bipolar arthroplasty and then about seven years later required revision for femoral stem fracture.I can confirm that this event occurred since i was able to see an x-ray, albeit unmarked, showing a left femoral hip stem fracture.The summary provided stated that the patient had explantation but no operation report or photographs of the explanted prosthesis are provided.The causes of femoral stem fracture are multifactorial, including surgical technique factors, especially cementing technique, patient factors including bmi and activity level, and implant factors." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to loosening and fracture of the exeter stem.Visual inspection of the returned device confirms that the device was fractured.The damage is consistent with fatigue accumulation in the stem ultimately ending in a fatigue fracture of the stem requiring revision.A review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "this inquiry concerns a case of a patient who underwent a cemented bipolar arthroplasty and then about seven years later required revision for femoral stem fracture.I can confirm that this event occurred since i was able to see an x-ray, albeit unmarked, showing a left femoral hip stem fracture.[.] the causes of femoral stem fracture are multifactorial, including surgical technique factors, especially cementing technique, patient factors including bmi and activity level, and implant factors." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EXETER V40 STEM 35.5MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
joann ripoli
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key13767289
Report Number0002249697-2022-00396
Device Sequence Number12014040
Product Code JDI
UDI-Device Identifier04546540153234
UDI-Public04546540153234
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K173499
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2019
Device Model Number0580-1-351
Device Catalogue Number0580-1-351
Device Lot NumberG5594159
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/17/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/15/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/27/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/15/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-