• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number PCB00
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/17/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Age or date of birth, weight, or ethnicity: unknown/ not provided.Implant date: if implanted, give date: not applicable, the lens was not implanted.Explant date: if explanted, give date: not applicable, the lens was not implanted; therefore, not explanted.Reporter telephone number: (b)(6).Device evaluation: the product testing could not be performed as the product was not returned for evaluation.The reported complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturing record evaluation: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search in complaint system revealed that no other complaint was received for this production order number.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Customer reported lens did not come out it remained stuck in the injector and damaged the lens.No further information provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on mar 22, 2022.Section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the preloaded was received with the plunger rod in the advanced and locked position.Further inspection revealed that the iol was received stuck inside of the cartridge and that the plunger rod had overridden the lens.The handpiece was disassembled and the assembly was inspected; no assembly issues were identified.The lens was removed and cleaned, presenting with lens creases (lens damage) from being folded long term in the cartridge.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13767503
Report Number3012236936-2022-00613
Device Sequence Number5033092
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474558311
UDI-Public(01)05050474558311(17)240406
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/06/2024
Device Model NumberPCB00
Device Catalogue NumberPCB0000225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/17/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/15/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/06/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-