• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Electromagnetic Interference (1194); Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 12/01/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that the patient had an mri and felt painful shocking in the legs.Per caller, the patient handed the mri tech her mdt implant card, the mri tech never turned off her implant and scanned her.Per patient, she did not elect to stop the mri and they continued to scan her.
 
Event Description
The patient reports that since her mri she cannot feel the stim anymore and is not getting relief.Rep turned the stim up very high and confirmed that she indeed cannot feel it.The patient is old and a relatively difficult historian, and rep could not confirm with her if the mri event was the defining factor that ended her ability to feel the stim, or if she lost stim sensation long before the mri.That being said, the details surrounding whether or not an mri tech confirmed with her that her stim was off, was also hazy in detail at best.The patient¿s inability to accurately articulate detailed historical facts surrounding this event makes any report difficult.So the bottom line is, the patient had a bad experience in an mri with what she describes as ¿increased stim¿, but we don¿t know if the stimulator was ever actually confirmed to be on, off, or dead completely at the time of the event.Also to note, she is not still feeling any adverse sensations as a result of this event.Rep reported they also know that as of the writing of the initial report, she could not feel stimulation and was in increased pain.But again, there is no conclusion as to when this happen ed.She cannot remember events surrounding her stimulator prior to her mri, which was a couple months before meeting with rep.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key13769430
MDR Text Key287269915
Report Number3004209178-2022-03283
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000315467
UDI-Public00763000315467
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 09/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/15/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2022
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/26/2022
Date Device Manufactured04/20/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight58 KG
-
-