• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Crack (1135)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 02/22/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Patient weight: unknown, information not provided.If explanted, give date: not applicable, lens remains implanted in the eye.(b)(4).The device was not returned for analysis, therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that upon insertion, the tip of preloaded intraocular lens (iol) device was broken.The incision was enlarged, however, sutures and a vitrectomy were not required.The iol was fully inserted into patient's right eye as it was not defective.It took extra maneuvering using micro-forceps to get the lens positioned correctly.The lens remains implanted.There was no patient injury and no other intervention was required.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device available for evaluation: yes.Returned to manufacturer on: mar 23, 2022.Device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the handpiece was received with the plunger rod fully advanced.Stress marks were identified inside of the cartridge tip; however, they are within acceptable parameters.The external assembly was inspected and, the plunger rod tip was observed to be bent.The handpiece was disassembled and the assembly was inspected, presenting with no assembly issues.No iol was received as part of this return.Based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13773022
Report Number3012236936-2022-00640
Device Sequence Number3812800
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731592
UDI-Public(01)05050474731592(17)240617
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/17/2024
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0120
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/22/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/17/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/15/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/17/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-