• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DFW150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
Date of Event 01/27/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a visual analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's right eye due to the patient was experiencing unbearable glare and halo 6 weeks post-operative (op and especially at night.The incision was enlarged.It was also reported that the patient was having difficulty driving at night.Pre-operative visual acuity is 20/60 dv cc (dv-distance vision, cc-with correction).The explanted iol was replaced with another j&j lens model zcu150 18.5 diopter (different model, same diopter).Post-operative visual acuity is 20/25 -1 dv and 2025 nv sc (nv-near vision, sc-without correction).Reportedly, there was no vitrectomy and no sutures were required.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: mar 25, 2022.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the suspect iol was received inside a specimen cup.The lens was removed and visual inspection revealed cosmetic issues and lens damage.No defects that could contribute to visual issues were observed.A product quality deficiency could not be determined.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc., has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13773598
Report Number3012236936-2022-00588
Device Sequence Number19240685
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474751231
UDI-Public(01)05050474751231(17)240607
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/07/2024
Device Model NumberDFW150
Device Catalogue NumberDFW150U185
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/02/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/29/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/15/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/07/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-