Olympus received the following literature article: clinical benefit of the multibending endoscope for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial by k.Hamada, et al.The study evaluated the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) using a multibending endoscope in the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms.A total of 60 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive conventional esd (c-esd) or multibending esd (m-esd), with no follow-up endoscopy.Patients were permitted to be discharged on the fourth postoperative day and had a postoperative consultation 2 weeks and 6 months after discharge.The evaluation was conducted for esd procedure time, the primary outcome, and the dissection speed, peri-operative complications, intraoperative perforation, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and damage to the muscle layers during esd were among the secondary outcomes.The reported median esd procedure time was 36.0 minutes, with a significantly shorter procedure time noticed in the m-esd group.The mean dissection speed was significantly faster in the m-esd group than in the c-esd group.Also, muscle layer damage occurred significantly less frequently in the m-esd group.In conclusion, the study favored m-esd and said a shorter procedure time could decrease not only the risk of complications but also the cost and burden on the medical staff.In the c-esd group, a gif-q260j evis lucera gastrointestinal videoscope with a waterjet system and a kd-655l single use electrosurgical knife/ dualknife j were used.Muscle layer damage was defined as findings in which the circular muscle was damaged by energization of the electrical knife.Complications occurred such as muscle layer damage.In the m-esd group, a gif-2tq260m evis lucera gastrointestinal videoscope and a kd-655l single use electrosurgical knife/ dualknife j were used.Complications occurred such as delayed bleeding and muscle layer damage.The adverse events reported in the study: delayed bleeding (2); muscle layer damage (2).This event includes three (3) reports: (b)(6) for gif-2tq260m: delayed bleeding (2) and muscle layer damage (1); (b)(6) for gif-q260j: muscle layer damage (1); (b)(6) for kd-655l: delayed bleeding (2) and muscle layer damage (2).This is report 3 of 3 for (b)(6) for kd-655l.
|
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information received from the author and the results of the legal manufacturer¿s investigation.See updated sections b5, d8, d10, and h10.D10: the cv-290 used in the procedure may have been one or more of the following serial numbers: (b)(6).The legal manufacturer performed an investigation.The dhr review could not be performed as no lot number was reported and there was no device return to inspect for a lot number.If the lot number becomes available at a later date, the dhr shall be reviewed.The root cause of the issue could not be conclusively specified.Based on the reported details, it was likely the event was not caused by a defect in the product, however, the cause of the event could not be identified.
|