• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655 Back to Search Results
Model Number KD-655L
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (4476); Muscle/Tendon Damage (4532)
Event Date 10/05/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus received the following literature article: clinical benefit of the multibending endoscope for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial by k.Hamada, et al.The study evaluated the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) using a multibending endoscope in the treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms.A total of 60 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive conventional esd (c-esd) or multibending esd (m-esd), with no follow-up endoscopy.Patients were permitted to be discharged on the fourth postoperative day and had a postoperative consultation 2 weeks and 6 months after discharge.The evaluation was conducted for esd procedure time, the primary outcome, and the dissection speed, peri-operative complications, intraoperative perforation, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and damage to the muscle layers during esd were among the secondary outcomes.The reported median esd procedure time was 36.0 minutes, with a significantly shorter procedure time noticed in the m-esd group.The mean dissection speed was significantly faster in the m-esd group than in the c-esd group.Also, muscle layer damage occurred significantly less frequently in the m-esd group.In conclusion, the study favored m-esd and said a shorter procedure time could decrease not only the risk of complications but also the cost and burden on the medical staff.In the c-esd group, a gif-q260j evis lucera gastrointestinal videoscope with a waterjet system and a kd-655l single use electrosurgical knife/ dualknife j were used.Muscle layer damage was defined as findings in which the circular muscle was damaged by energization of the electrical knife.Complications occurred such as muscle layer damage.In the m-esd group, a gif-2tq260m evis lucera gastrointestinal videoscope and a kd-655l single use electrosurgical knife/ dualknife j were used.Complications occurred such as delayed bleeding and muscle layer damage.The adverse events reported in the study: delayed bleeding (2); muscle layer damage (2).This event includes three (3) reports: (b)(6) for gif-2tq260m: delayed bleeding (2) and muscle layer damage (1); (b)(6) for gif-q260j: muscle layer damage (1); (b)(6) for kd-655l: delayed bleeding (2) and muscle layer damage (2).This is report 3 of 3 for (b)(6) for kd-655l.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Average age/years for patients was 73.5 for conventional esd group.Average age/years for patients was 74.2 for multibending esd group.Gender: male (21) and female (9) for conventional esd group.Gender: male (19) and female (11) for multibending esd group.The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation and the investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the author.The adverse event was not related to the olympus devices or the underlying condition(s) of the patient.There were no malfunctions of olympus devices in the study.The treatments provided to the patients with adverse events were not provided to olympus.The evis lucera elite video system center, cv-290 was also used in the study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information received from the author and the results of the legal manufacturer¿s investigation.See updated sections b5, d8, d10, and h10.D10: the cv-290 used in the procedure may have been one or more of the following serial numbers: (b)(6).The legal manufacturer performed an investigation.The dhr review could not be performed as no lot number was reported and there was no device return to inspect for a lot number.If the lot number becomes available at a later date, the dhr shall be reviewed.The root cause of the issue could not be conclusively specified.Based on the reported details, it was likely the event was not caused by a defect in the product, however, the cause of the event could not be identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-655
Type of Device
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13791708
MDR Text Key292985418
Report Number8010047-2022-04541
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170405624
UDI-Public04953170405624
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K171158
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/17/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberKD-655L
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/25/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EVIS LUCERA ELITE VIDEO SYSTEM CENTER, CV-290.; GIF-2TQ260M, GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE.; GIF-Q260J, EVIS LUCERA GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE.; VIO 300 D, ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT, ERBE.
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-