MERZ NORTH AMERICA, INC RADIESSE INJECTABLE IMPLANT; IMPLANT, DERMAL, FOR AESTHETIC USE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This case was assessed as reportable to the fda, as the event vascular compromise (pt: vascular compression), was deemed to meet the serious criteria of required intervention to prevent permanent damage.The device history record of radiesse injectable implant could not be reviewed, as the lot number was not reported.Kern, j., kollipara, r., hoss, e., boen, m., wu, d., groff, w., goldman, m.(2022).Serious adverse events with injectable fillers: retrospective analysis of 7,659 patient outcomes, dermatologic surgery, 1-5.Doi: http://dx.Doi.Org/10.1097/dss.0000000000003409.
|
|
Event Description
|
This case was linked to lssmv case number (b)(6) referring to the same literature article.This is a literature report from a retrospective study aimed to analyze injectable filler treatments spanning 11 years at a high-volume cosmetic dermatology practice to determine the incidence, management, and final outcome of these filler-related adverse events.This literature report from united states of america concerns a 34-year-old male patient.He was injected with a total of 1.5 ml of calcium hydroxyapatite, into the right medial cheek (off label use of device).The patient was injected in a single session with no more than 0.5 ml injected, into a single site.The patient had a history of nonabsorbable filler comprised polymethylmethacrylate microspheres in the treatment area, 3 years before.After the calcium hydroxyapatite injection, the patient experienced vascular compromise and secondary cutaneous necrosis.The cutaneous necrosis was on the cheek (site of prior polymethylmethacrylate microspheres injection).The events were quickly identified and managed appropriately.Initial treatment consisted of aspirin, pentoxifylline, nitroglycerin paste, 8 minutes of red light therapy to decrease inflammation, and prophylactic clarithromycin and valacyclovir.After noting minimal improvement, the patient was then treated with 14 dives of hyperbaric oxygen therapy.The patient was treated with hyperbaric oxygen, topical wound care with silicone dressings, and fractionated laser resurfacing and achieved complete resolution of epidermal scaring.The outcome of the events was reported as resolved.In the opinion of the authors, occlusion possibly occurred because of direct compromise of the intravascular space, compression of the vessel because of the surrounding edema and mass effect, or embolization of the filler to a distant site.Depending on the anatomic allocation and percentage of occlusion, sequelae ranged from local tissue necrosis to blindness and even stroke.Even with prompt management, vascular complications had the possibility to be irreversible.In addition, it was important that patients divulged their cosmetic treatment history before receiving filler because complications arose because of underlying fibrosis, anatomic variations, or other skin changes resulting from previous procedures.
|
|
Event Description
|
Follow up information was received on 11-apr-2022: the suspect product was recoded from durapatite to radiesse.The patient was injected with radiesse.The outcome of the event remained unchanged.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|