| Model Number |
72203801 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Crack (1135); Difficult to Insert (1316)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/28/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during use in a rotator cuff repair procedure, the healicoil anchor could not be inserted into the bone hole, the anchor was cracked in the vertical direction.The bone hole was made with a shoulder awl straight and the insertion site was cleared from all debris.The procedure was completed with non-significant surgical delay and was finished with a smith and nephew back up device.No further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H1: type of reportable event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: case (b)(4).The reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and material tests were appropriately documented.There was no way to determine if the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed, and the root cause could not be determined.Factors, which could have contributed to the complaint event, include an application of unintended or inappropriate or excessive force to the device please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).Inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and material tests were appropriately documented.There was no way to determine if the device contributed to the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed, and the root cause could not be determined.Factors, which could have contributed to the complaint event, include an application of unintended or inappropriate or excessive force to the device please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|