• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number LTF-S190-10
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Abdominal Pain (1685); Fever (1858); Fistula (1862)
Event Date 07/27/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature: "the superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach" by takanori morikawa, et al.This retrospective study was aimed to investigate the following to describe these novel techniques for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (ldp) to assess the perioperative outcomes of ldp using the superior approach (sa), in which the upper border of the pancreas is dissected first to identify the root of the splenic artery compared to those of the inferior approach (ia), in ia dissection of the distal pancreas starts along the inferior margin of the pancreas after approaching the lesser sac, and to investigate the effect of the protocol on the learning curve among surgeons-in-training.A total of 45 patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, in which the inferior approach was used to perform distal pancreatectomies (n=20), and 25 procedures were performed using the superior approach (n=25).The stomach roll-up technique was used in all cases and the perioperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.The study reported a significantly shorter operation time (p < 0.001) and lower estimated blood loss (p = 0.011), with the ia than the sa.The study concluded superior approach with the stomach roll-up as a simple technique and would aid in educating surgeons on performing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.The authors reported the procedures were performed with one olympus device, ltf-s190-10, and other non-olympus devices and reported the following adverse events and number of patients: total morbidity - (23); major complications/ morbidity (= cd grade iiia) - (10).Pancreatic fistula grade b/c - (17), grade b pancreatic fistula.However, no cases required reoperation, and there were no deaths.Readmissions after discharge - (3): three patients were readmitted due to pyrexia (n=2) and abdominal pain (n=1).The same tendency was observed in the cohort in which patients with conversion or concomitant procedures were excluded.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information from the author.New information added to event.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the author: the patients with grade b pancreatic fistulas needed drainage treatment.There were no patients with grade c.Also, the patients re-admitted performed conservative treatments, due to delayed pancreatic fistulas.The author could not provide additional details regarding the cases of morbidity.The author provided the following details regarding the adverse events grade clavien dindo class iiia all were with grade b pancreatic fistulas.In the opinion of the author, there was no relationship between the olympus devices and adverse events reported in the study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13811414
MDR Text Key292985114
Report Number8010047-2022-04646
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier04953170310386
UDI-Public04953170310386
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K111425
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLTF-S190-10
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/18/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received03/23/2022
05/19/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/20/2022
06/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-