• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 FULL KIT 18G X 10 CM WITH PROBE COVER; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,SHORT-TERM LESS THAN 30 DAYS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 FULL KIT 18G X 10 CM WITH PROBE COVER; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,SHORT-TERM LESS THAN 30 DAYS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Date of Event 02/25/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported "floor rn was dcing pg catheter and when took dressing off arm there was no catheter attached to the hub.Could not see the catheter under the skin but patient said was tender.Did an x-ray inside the room and catheter was evident in the arm.Placement was r upper arm brachial.Did ultrasound of the area and there was a clot.Decision was to surgically remove and that is scheduled for today monday the (b)(6).Catheter was located right where insertion site was.The pg was put in by picc team." "on friday we had a patient whose powerglide was removed and the catheter was retained.We have saved the piece that came out, and the patient is going to ir today to try to remove the retained catheter." additional info.Received: was there any patient harm reported? if yes, please describe the harm, how it was treated and the outcome: patient had to undergo ultrasound and then surgical procedure for removal, hospitalization was extended (patient was in process of being discharged when retained catheter fragment discovered) and a thrombus centered around the catheter in the proximal and mid segments of the deep brachial vein was also discovered in the process of locating the catheter fragment, so heparin therapy was initiated." how was the retained segment discovered?: discovered upon removal of non-intact catheter ¿ ultrasound verified are radiographic images available.Yes.Were all the missing/broken pieces retrieved and accounted for?: yes, removed under fluoroscopy.What type of imaging was used to verify broken piece in patient?: x-ray right arm and ultrasound.Any long-term patient harm?: undetermined ¿ hospitalization extended, surgical removal of catheter, thrombus formation around catheter.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) of reft4458 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, complaint and batch history, applicable previous investigation(s), labeling, applicable manufacturing records, sample analysis and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a fractured catheter is confirmed.One 10 cm powerglide pro catheter was returned for evaluation.Blood residue was visible within the components.A complete break in the catheter shaft occurred at the proximal end of the catheter extending from the hub.Two kinks were visible 2.2cm and 3.5cm from the break location.Microscopic observation of the proximal break surface a rough and uneven break.An additional angled partial split was propagating from the break surface.The distal break surface was observed to be compressed with evidence of being kinked.The characteristics of the damage suggest that kinking, tensile, and torsional stresses likely contributed to the fracturing of the catheter during use; therefore, the complaint is confirmed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported "floor rn was dcing pg catheter and when took dressing off arm there was no catheter attached to the hub.Could not see the catheter under the skin but patient said was tender.Did an x-ray inside the room and catheter was evident in the arm.Placement was r upper arm brachial.Did ultrasound of the area and there was a clot.Decision was to surgically remove and that is scheduled for today monday the (b)(6).Catheter was located right where insertion site was.The pg was put in by picc team." "on friday we had a patient whose powerglide was removed and the catheter was retained.We have saved the piece that came out, and the patient is going to ir today to try to remove the retained catheter." additional info.Received: ¿ was there any patient harm reported? if yes, please describe the harm, how it was treated and the outcome: patient had to undergo ultrasound and then surgical procedure for removal, hospitalization was extended (patient was in process of being discharged when retained catheter fragment discovered) and a thrombus centered around the catheter in the proximal and mid segments of the deep brachial vein was also discovered in the process of locating the catheter fragment, so heparin therapy was initiated." ¿ how was the retained segment discovered?: discovered upon removal of non-intact catheter ¿ ultrasound verified are radiographic images available yes.¿ were all the missing/broken pieces retrieved and accounted for?: yes, removed under fluoroscopy.¿ what type of imaging was used to verify broken piece in patient?: x-ray right arm and ultrasound.¿ any long-term patient harm?: undetermined ¿ hospitalization extended, surgical removal of catheter, thrombus formation around catheter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FULL KIT 18G X 10 CM WITH PROBE COVER
Common Device Name
CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,SHORT-TERM LESS THAN 30 DAYS
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
kelsey erickson
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
8015950700
MDR Report Key13826015
Report Number3006260740-2022-00882
Device Sequence Number17318907
Product Code FOZ
UDI-Device Identifier00801741140617
UDI-Public(01)00801741140617
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K162377
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberF218108PT
Device Lot NumberREFT4458
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/14/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/28/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/02/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/19/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight54 KG
-
-