• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5955460
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 01/10/2018
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st with echo on (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st with echo.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.Attorney alleges that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st with echo on (b)(6) 2016.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st with echo.It is alleged that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.Attorney alleges that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with umbilical hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of bard soft mesh (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿a piece of bard soft mesh (device 1) was placed into the retrorectus space and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with small bowel obstruction and recurrent hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of ventralight st using echo ps (device 2).Per operative notes, ¿a ventralight st using echo ps (device 2) was placed into the abdomen and attach it to the anterior abdominal wall and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2018 ¿ patient was diagnosed with multiply recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with partial removal of (device 1 and device 2).Per operative notes, ¿the retrorectus piece of mesh and intraperitoneal mesh was noted.Both pieces of mesh were cut in half.Adhesions were lysed.The mesenteric border of the bowel was scarred.A piece of synthetic mesh was placed and secured using sutures.¿.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2,b3,b4,b5,b6,b7,d3,d4(product catalog no., udi no, expiry date, corporate lot no.), d.6b (date of explant), g3,g6,h2,h4,h6,h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VENTRALIGHT ST W/ ECHO
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key13829356
Report Number1213643-2022-92262
Device Sequence Number4466633
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031724
UDI-Public(01)00801741031724(17)171028(10)HUZI1216
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K130968
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Device Explanted Year2018
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/28/2017
Device Catalogue Number5955460
Device Lot NumberHUZI1216
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/08/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/22/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/20/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age33 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-