| Model Number |
8577 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/10/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It reported that removal difficulties occurred.A percutaneous coronary intervention was being performed.The target lesion was located in the 99% stenosed severely calcified and mildly tortuous left anterior descending artery.This 135cm mamba flex microcatheter along with a rotawire guidewire were selected.During the procedure the mamba microcatheter became sticky and was very difficult to remove from the rotawire.They attempted to flush the lumen which was also difficult, they remove the device from the patient by firmly pulling the mamba off of the rotawire.During the removal the rotawire guidewire became severely mangled.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It reported that removal difficulties occurred.A percutaneous coronary intervention was being performed.The target lesion was located in the 99% stenosed severely calcified and mildly tortuous left anterior descending artery.This 135cm mamba flex microcatheter along with a rotawire guidewire were selected.During the procedure the mamba microcatheter became sticky and was very difficult to remove from the rotawire.They attempted to flush the lumen which was also difficult, they remove the device from the patient by firmly pulling the mamba off of the rotawire.During the removal the rotawire guidewire became severely mangled.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No patient complications were reported.It was further reported that the carrier hoop was flushed prior to mamba being removed from the hoop.The inner lumen was flushed prior to use in the patient or guidewire insertion.An antegrade approach was performed.The target lesion was located in a 99% stenosed, moderately tortuous, severely calcified, proximal artery.Lesion difficulty occurred in a, b1, b2, c - c.The guidewire that was used during this procedure had a 1mm bend from distal tip, and was a fresh guidewire (less than 15 minutes in the patient).The friction with the guidewire occurred in the mid shaft of the mamba.After the resistance was encountered, the mamba catheter was flushed, which made an improvement.A new guidewire was also used, which did and did not improve the resistance.No further patient complications were reported in relation to this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluated by mfr: returned product consisted of a mamba flex 135cm microcatheter with no guidewire in the device, and blood in the hub and lumen.The hub, shaft and tip were visually and microscopically examined.The device showed no shaft damage.The reported complaint was issued for difficult to remove the guidewire during the procedure.No guidewire was returned.A.014 test guidewire was inserted into the hub end of the device and the wire transcended through the device with no hesitations or restrictions through the lumen and exited the tip end.The device was flushed with a syringe of fluid, and the fluid as well as blood exited the tip end.The tip was damaged as part of it was bent outward and misshapen.Inspection of the remainder of the device revealed no other damage or defects.Product analysis could not confirm the reported events, as the guidewire passed through with no issues or resistance, was able to flush, and clinical circumstances could not be replicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|