• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK SURPASS EVOLVE 4.5MM X 15MM - IDE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK SURPASS EVOLVE 4.5MM X 15MM - IDE; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number FDC45015
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Stroke/CVA (1770); Pain (1994); Stenosis (2263); Numbness (2415)
Event Date 11/03/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported in a clinical trial that the patient was treated for a right internal carotid artery-clinoid (c5 segment) aneurysm with the subject flow diverter.The procedure was successful with the subject flow diverter completely covering the aneurysm neck and no reported complications.64 days post procedure, the patient presented to the emergency room after a ground level fall with left knee pain and upper extremity numbness.Imaging done showed more than 50% stenosis of the right internal carotid artery (ica).The patient was treated with pain management and physiotherapy.In the physician's opinion, the stenosis was related to patient's history of neck radiation.This event resolved 3 days later.144 days post procedure, the patient had a stroke that presented with right upper arm weakness/numbness which required a 2 day hospitalization.Imaging done showed 72% stenosis of the proximal right ica and a small cortical infarct.Treatment given during this time was unknown as patient was out of town but event resolved 6 days later.According to the site, there is a probability of the stroke being related to the underlying condition or disease.No ther information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device is implanted in patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The subject device is not available; therefore, functional testing as well as visual testing cannot be performed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.It was reported in a clinical trial that the patient had left upper extremity numbness and more than 50% stenosis of the right internal carotid artery found on imaging 64 days post procedure with the subject flow diverter.144 days post procedure, the patient also had a stroke that presented with right upper arm weakness/numbness which required hospitalization.Additional information provided by the customer indicated that the device was implanted successfully without any device deficiencies noted during the procedure and the pi feels the subject's stenosis is related to his history of radiation therapy to his neck.The patient fall was not related to the vessel stenosis.Based upon medical review, the harm observed in this complaint is anticipated in nature as per the device risk assessment.As a product related root cause does not apply and the issue is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure and/or patient condition noted within the dfu, product labeling and/or risk documentation files, an assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication will be assigned to the as reported 'patient parent vessel stenosis', 'patient neurological deficit' and 'patient stroke' in this complaint.
 
Event Description
It was reported in a clinical trial that the patient was treated for a right internal carotid artery-clinoid (c5 segment) aneurysm with the subject flow diverter.The procedure was successful with the subject flow diverter completely covering the aneurysm neck and no reported complications.64 days post procedure, the patient presented to the emergency room after a ground level fall with left knee pain and upper extremity numbness.Imaging done showed more than 50% stenosis of the right internal carotid artery (ica).The patient was treated with pain management and physiotherapy.In the physician's opinion, the stenosis was related to patient's history of neck radiation.This event resolved 3 days later.144 days post procedure, the patient had a stroke that presented with right upper arm weakness/numbness which required a 2 day hospitalization.Imaging done showed 72% stenosis of the proximal right ica and a small cortical infarct.Treatment given during this time was unknown as patient was out of town but event resolved 6 days later.According to the site, there is a probability of the stroke being related to the underlying condition or disease.No ther information is available.
 
Event Description
It was reported in a clinical trial that the patient was treated for a right internal carotid artery-clinoid (c5 segment) aneurysm with the subject flow diverter.The procedure was successful with the subject flow diverter completely covering the aneurysm neck and no reported complications.64 days post procedure, the patient presented to the emergency room after a ground level fall with left knee pain and upper extremity numbness.Imaging done showed more than 50% stenosis of the right internal carotid artery (ica).The patient was treated with pain management and physiotherapy.In the physician's opinion, the stenosis was related to patient's history of neck radiation.This event resolved 3 days later.144 days post procedure, the patient had a stroke that presented with right upper arm weakness/numbness which required a 2 day hospitalization.Imaging done showed 72% stenosis of the proximal right ica and a small cortical infarct.Treatment given during this time was unknown as patient was out of town but event resolved 6 days later.According to the site, there is a probability of the stroke being related to the underlying condition or disease.No ther information is available.According to the additional information received on 21-jun-2022, it was reported that stroke was assessed by the cec member to have possible relationship to the subject flow diverter and the ground level fall with left knee pain was assessed by the cec member to have no relationship to subject flow diverter.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.It was reported in a clinical trial that the patient had a "ground level fall with left knee pain' and more than 50% stenosis of the right internal carotid artery, found on imaging 64 days post procedure with the subject flow diverter.144 days post procedure, the patient also had a "stroke" that presented with right upper arm weakness/numbness which required hospitalization.According to the additional information received on 21-jul-2022, it was reported that ae "stroke" was assessed by the cec member to have possible relationship to the subject flow diverter and the ae "ground level fall with left knee pain and left upper extremity numbness" was assessed by the cec member to have no relationship to subject flow diverter or other stryker devices.Based upon medical review, the harm observed in this complaint is anticipated in nature as per the device risk assessment.As a product related root cause does not apply and the issue is due to a known physiological effect of the procedure and/or patient condition noted within the dfu, product labeling and/or risk documentation files, an assignable cause of anticipated procedural complication will be assigned to 'patient parent vessel stenosis' and 'patient stroke' in this complaint.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURPASS EVOLVE 4.5MM X 15MM - IDE
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK
ida industrial estate
model farm road
cork NA
EI  NA
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER NEUROVASCULAR CORK
ida industrial estate
model farm road
cork NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
tara lopez
47900 bayside parkway
fremont, CA 94538
5104132500
MDR Report Key13831681
MDR Text Key287896078
Report Number3008881809-2022-00125
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P170024/S003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/20/2021
Device Catalogue NumberFDC45015
Device Lot Number22539001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/21/2022
Initial Date FDA Received03/20/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/10/2022
07/11/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/07/2022
08/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/21/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-