The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the reported device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.The material inpsection report for this guidewire lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.It should be noted that use of the device in the mesenteric artery is an off-label application.The instructions for use manual states, "the diamondback 360® peripheral orbital atherectomy system is a percutaneous orbital atherectomy system indicated for use as therapy in patients with occlusive atherosclerotic disease in peripheral arteries and who are acceptable candidates for percutaneous transluminal atherectomy." (b)(4).
|
A diamondback peripheral orbital atherectomy device (oad) was used for treatment of the superior mesenteric artery (sma).Right groin access was obtained, and a 6fr guide catheter was used.The vessel was primary wired with a.014 coronary guidewire (non-csi wire).The ostium and proximal segment were severely calcified.Following wire exchange, multiple low, medium, and high treatments were performed with excellent result.The oad was stopped in the proximal section, and the physician attempted removal of the oad.Resistance was encountered in removing the device as the sma curved back 180 degrees in the proximal segment.The physician used more force than typical to remove the wire and oad, but the force was not extreme.At that time, it was noted that a portion of the wire remained in the patient.The remaining portion was approximately 15-20cm.Angioplasty was applied to the treatment area.An unsuccessful attempt was made to snare the remaining wire.The fragment was unable to be retrieved via snare and was ultimately stented against the vessel wall.Stenting of the artery post oas was planned prior to procedure.
|