|
(b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Investigation summary: visual analysis of image submitted for evaluation determined that a winding former could be observed with one apparently detached from product code j494h, image not clear to determine failure mode.To avoid this kind of damage: grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.No conclusion could be reached as to what caused the reported complaint since the sample was not returned for analysis.It should be noted that as part of our quality process, the device is visually inspected and functionally tested during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.Female, (b)(6), normal bmi.Date and name of index surgical procedure? (b)(6) 2022.Lot number? rjmbam.The diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? compound dysplastic nevus with mod atypia, + margins.What was the initial approach for the index surgical procedure? (open, laparoscopic or other)? cutaneous.On what tissue was the suture used? dermis, sq.What was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? normal.How was the suture placed (interrupted or continuous)? interrupted.After the needle pulled off the suture and fell into the patient, was the needle removed during that initial surgery? yes.Was a second procedure required to remove the needle? no.Does the needle remain retained in the patient as the current time? na.If yes, what structure is the needle located in? na.If yes, are there plans to remove the needle at a later time? na.Please describe any medical/surgical intervention required for this suture event including dates and results.Na.Did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? no.What is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? defective suture.What is the patient's current status? alive and well.If applicable, will product or representative samples be returned? if so, please provide the name and address of where the samples are located and a mailer can be sent.
|