| Model Number |
1365-36-220 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Fall (1848); Joint Dislocation (2374); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
03/06/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient had a hip dislocation after a fall.Surgeon chose to revise shell to competitive acetabular shell.Femoral head was removed from a surgery on (b)(6) 2014.There was no surgical delay.Doi: (b)(6) 2014; dor (b)(6) 2022; affected side: left hip.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received indicating that "while the patient had been stable for quite some time, post fall she dislocated sooner than he would like when range of motion was checked.The surgeon felt he could improve stability if the cup were in a better position.Surgeon used a competitive cup because with their dual mobility he could get to a 28mm head at a smaller cup size than we offer allowing him more length options sooner.In addition, he also stated that he would be able to have a larger articulation than with our system.Both statements are accurate.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : the device associated with this complaint was not returned for examination.The photo investigation confirmed the reported allegation, from the x-rays provided a dislocation event can be seen.Depuy synthes considers the investigation closed at this time.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation may be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mrae) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|