| Model Number |
CAX200T12 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Degraded (1153)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/21/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a cpap device's sound abatement foam.There was no allegation of harm or injury.This issue was reported to the fda per 21 cfr 806.The device will be corrected per res 88058.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This mdr is being submitted as part of a batch submission of complaints that were reassessed as reportable foam degradation complaints; discovered as part of a retrospective remediation review.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturer previously reported incorrect information in section b5 as receiving information alleging an issue related to a cpap device's sound abatement foam.There was no allegation of harm or injury.This issue was reported to the fda per 21 cfr 806.The device will be corrected per res 88058.Section b5 should have been reported as: a cpap was returned to the manufacturer for service.There was no harm or injury reported.During the evaluation of the device at the manufacturer's service center, filter rurn black was not confirmed.No repair was performed.The device was scrapped.Section e1 was incorrectly reported in previous report which is now correctly updated in this follow-up report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer previously received information alleging an issue related to a cpap device's sound abatement foam.Patient alleged visualization of particles.There was no report of patient harm or injury.The device was returned to the manufacturer's service center for further evaluation.The device was evaluated.There was no mention of visual findings to the external part of the device.The internal aspect of the device was inspected.The device powered on and airflow was confirmed.The device's downloaded logs were reviewed by the manufacturer.There were 4 errors found.The manufacturer concludes that they could not confirm the customer's allegation and there was no visible foam degradation.Section h6 updated in this report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|