|
Implanted date: device was not implanted.Implanted date: device was not implanted.Occupation: registered technologist (rt r).The actual device was not returned; therefore, an evaluation of the actual device was unable to be conducted.A review of the manufacturing record and the product release decision control sheet confirmed that there were not any indications of anomaly in them.A search of the complaint file found no other similar report with the involved product code/lot number combination from other facilities.Based on the investigation result, no anomaly was found in the records.It was likely that the actual product was sheared off due to excessive pulling force applied for some reason.However, since the actual sample was not returned for the investigation, the cause of occurrence could not be clarified.Ashitaka factory assures the quality of this product by performing following inspections: i) after the shaft is molded on the core wire whose outer diameter is controlled, the core wire is removed to assure the inner diameter of shaft.Ii) before the packaging processes, 100 percent magnifying inspection is performed to assure that there is no anomaly including a breakage on the catheter.Iii) in the packaging and cartoning processes, dedicated tools and containers are used to protect the product and to prevent generation of a breakage.The ifu states: "warning - never advance or withdraw an intraluminal device against resistance until the cause of resistance is determined by fluoroscopy.Failure to exercise proper caution may result in damage to the vessel or catheter.Separation of the catheter may occur requiring retrieval in some cases." (b)(4).
|