• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. FRED 27; FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. FRED 27; FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number MV-F451827
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 02/21/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that during treatment of a cerebral aneurysm, the fred flow diverter stent was implanted and although the deployment of the stent appeared to have no problems, angiography taken immediately afterward revealed decreased blood flow to the anterior cerebral artery (aca).Closer examination confirmed an in-stent thrombus on the distal side of the stent.The stent was started to be deployed from m1 and after the stent was positioned so that only the flare part covered the aca using a jail technique, the stent was deployed.Angiography showed a suspected decrease in blood flow on the aca side and detailed imaging revealed a thrombus-like around the distal flare on the aca side.Concerned about insufficient stent apposition on the distal side, ozagrel and urokinase were administered and effent was then added while percutaneous old balloon angioplasty (poba) was performing on the m1 side and the a1 side through the flare.The thrombus did not completely disappear by poba and it was suspected that a thrombus might have occurred in the stent.The stent was therefore attempted to be removed using a snare device, but the stent could not be removed in one attempt.However, angiography showed that the thrombus disappeared and blood flow in the aca recovered.Angiography was repeated every 5 minutes and confirmed that there was no change in the condition.The procedure was ended without removing the stent.Due to the attempt to remove the stent, the distal flare was broken and located on the proximal side of the stent on fluoroscopy.The patient recovered and is being followed up on.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The lot number was not provided; therefore, a search for device history record (dhr) could not be performed.The device remain implanted in the patient and not available for return to the manufacturer and procedure images were not provided.Therefore, the alleged product issue cannot be confirmed.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies stent thrombosis as a potential complication associated with use of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information received indicating no addition treatment is planned at this point.Current patient condition described as "patient is doing well.Angiographic follow-up had not been done yet.Mra showed that blood flow to the aneurysm still remains." physician will decide whether additional treatment if needed if aneurysm does not resolve at 12-month follow-up.Review of set of images provided by physician: there are two right ica aneurysms: a 5x7.5 mm ophthalmic with an approximately 4 mm neck, and a small, about 2.5 mm wide-necked pcom.Three parent artery measurements are seen: 3.58 mm just distal to pcom aneurysm, 4.9 mm in the mid cavernous ica, and 3.76 mm in the posterior ica siphon.Subsequent images show the fred being deployed through a headway 27 from the ica terminus (finished ends) to the posterior ica siphon; the braided portion of the fred is in the distal ica and not in the terminus itself.Later, clot is seen in the distal aspect of the stent (more on a1 side) and there is marked slow flow in the aca with only the a1 segment visualized.Then a guidewire microballoon catheter combination is seen through the stent to the m1 mca, and then to the a2 segment of the aca, with flow reestablished in aca and decrease in the amount of clot.Later, there is recurrence of clot in the distal stent again mostly on the a1 side.Balloon angioplasty is again performed through m1 and a1, with minimal change in the clot.There also appears to be new clot in the proximal part of the stent.There are then images showing the unsuccessful attempt at removing the fred with a solitaire 6x40 mm.A final completion ap right ica angiogram shows the stent opened with no clot.Still unsubtracted lateral and oblique radiographs show that one of the distal fred radiopaque markers is now located in the distal aspect of the braided portion of the fred, as described in the complaint; this is presumably damage caused by the removal attempt.Post-op day 1 dwi mr axial images show no evidence of ischemic hits.Post-op day 3 ap oblique right ica subtracted dsa shows normal flow through the stent and no clot.The cause for the clot formation is not seen on the images provided.Without the return and physical evaluation of the device, the investigation is unable to determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FRED 27
Type of Device
FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key13904704
MDR Text Key287920912
Report Number2032493-2022-00107
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P180027
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/25/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMV-F451827
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-