|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 FILL KIT 20G X 10CM WITH BIOPATCH; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,SHORT-TERM LESS THAN 30 DAYS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/28/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported "midline catheter leaking at hub of catheter.Picc nurse noted that when line flushed with normal saline, it leaked back out from the hub." placement date:(b)(6) 2022.Explant date: n/a was there any patient harm reported? no if yes, please describe the harm, how it was treated and the outcome.At what point during device use was the leak discovered (i.E.Insertion, infusion, removal) picc nurse noted that when line flushed with normal saline, it leaked back out from the hub.Was the catheter fracture internal to the patient or external? unknown what was infusion when the leak was discovered? saline any patient symptoms related to fluid leak? unknown was the catheter removed? yes was a new catheter placed? yes what type of catheter securement was utilized? unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported "midline catheter leaking at hub of catheter.Picc nurse noted that when line flushed with normal saline, it leaked back out from the hub." ¿ placement date: 2/28/22.¿ explant date: n/a.¿ was there any patient harm reported? no if yes, please describe the harm, how it was treated and the outcome.¿ at what point during device use was the leak discovered (i.E.Insertion, infusion, removal) picc nurse noted that when line flushed with normal saline, it leaked back out from the hub.Was the catheter fracture internal to the patient or external? unknown ¿ what was infusion when the leak was discovered? saline.¿ any patient symptoms related to fluid leak? unknown.¿ was the catheter removed? yes was a new catheter placed? yes.¿ what type of catheter securement was utilized? unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation:¿patient severity, applicable previous investigation(s), sample analysis, applicable fmea documents, and applicable manufacturing records.¿ based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a leak in the catheter was confirmed.The returned sample was a 20g x 10cm powerglide midline catheter.The catheter exhibited evidence of use.The powerglide catheter was kinked just distal to the pink strain relief sleeve.A microscopic examination of the catheter revealed two splits in the circumferential direction on the inside of the kink in the tubing.The splits exposed the inner lumen of the catheter and allowed fluid to leak during a functional test.The wall thickness of the catheter was within specification.The splits in the powerglide catheter appeared to be associated with the kinking of the tubing.The kinking may have been attributable to the securement method, location of the insertion site, and patient movement.No damage associated with the manufacturing process was observed on the returned sample.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|