| Model Number |
SMPX160 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Contracture (1761)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: capsular contracture.Explantation month, day, and year: (b)(6) 2022.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a hispanic female patient who underwent a primary breast augmentation procedure with mentor memorygel breast implant 160cc gel breast prostheses developed capsular contracture in both of her breasts post implantation (baker grade iv in left breast, baker grade iii in right breast.) bilateral capsular contracture was diagnosed by a healthcare professional.As a result, the patient is scheduled to undergo bilateral explantation on (b)(6) 2022.This medwatch report is for the patient¿s left breast prosthesis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On 19-sep-2022, mentor received additional information about the event.An updated explantation date of (b)(6) 2022 was reported.D6b explantation month, day, and year: (b)(6) 2022.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2022, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.On (b)(6) 2022, mentor completed the investigation on the suspect medical device.Device evaluation summary: according to the information reported, the patient developed capsular contracture.The product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.During visual evaluation no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the returned device.Mentor concluded that the capsular contracture in the patient¿s breast was the result of the body¿s individual physiological response to the implantation of a foreign object in soft tissue.Capsular contracture is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.The american society of plastic surgeons recommends and encourages member surgeons to always submit breast implants, capsule, and effusion to pathology for examination.As part of mentor¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|