• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G44154
Medical Device Problem Code Unraveled Material (1664)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/18/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Occupation = inventory manager.Device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, upon successful completion of a peripheral crossover intervention, a flexor ansel guiding sheath unraveled upon removal of the device.Access was obtained in the femoral artery, and a contralateral approach was used to target the external iliac.Mild calcification was noted.It is unknown if resistance was encountered upon insertion or removal of the sheath.Upon removal, the sheath began to unravel mid-shaft.The dilator was not reinserted prior to removal, and was not in place at the time of unraveling.The sheath, which did not fully separate, was able to be manually removed from the patient in one piece.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Event summary: as reported, upon successful completion of a peripheral crossover intervention, a flexor ansel guiding sheath unraveled upon removal of the device.Access was obtained in the femoral artery, and a contralateral approach was used to target the external iliac.Mild calcification was noted.It is unknown if resistance was encountered upon insertion or removal of the sheath.Upon removal, the sheath began to unravel mid-shaft.The dilator was not reinserted prior to removal, and was not in place at the time of unraveling.The sheath, which did not fully separate, was able to be manually removed from the patient in one piece.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.The complainant returned one used, damaged flexor ansel guiding sheath to cook for investigation.The shaft was unraveled at approximately 16cm from the white cap and was held together by the inner coil.The distal tip was kinked at 1cm and was out of round.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was functionally inspected by quality control and no notable gaps in production or processing controls were noted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: warnings: ¿reinsertion of dilator prior to removal of flexor sheath increases the strength of the sheath and lessens the risk of device separation.If resistance is anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of flexor sheath, consider carefully reinserting the dilator prior to continuing removal.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that operational factors contributed to this incident.The dilator was not inserted into the sheath prior to its removal from the patient, contrary to the warnings of the ifu.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR ANSEL GUIDING SHEATH
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8128294891
MDR Report Key13940033
Report Number1820334-2022-00482
Device Sequence Number4792557
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002441545
UDI-Public(01)00827002441545(17)250104(10)14451663
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K142829
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/04/2025
Device Model NumberG44154
Device Catalogue NumberKCFW-6.0-18/38-45-RB-ANL0-HC
Device Lot Number14451663
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/29/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/21/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/29/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/04/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-