• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIB INSERT IMPL CRC, SZ 5, 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC TIB INSERT IMPL CRC, SZ 5, 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number LOGIC TIB INSERT IMPL CRC, SZ 5, 9MM
Medical Device Problem Code Naturally Worn (2988)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Cyst(s) (1800); Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Synovitis (2094); Discomfort (2330); Osteolysis (2377); Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Joint Laxity (4526); Implant Pain (4561); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581); Joint effusion (4849)
Date of Event 03/07/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
As reported, this male patient had a revision due to the implant was one of the recalled polys.Surgeon replaced worn poly with a new poly.The poly was severely delaminated and pitted.There was no breakage of device or surgical delay/prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.The device will be return.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
After further review of additional information received the following sections d1, d4, d6a, g3, g4, g6, h2, h3, h4, h6 and h9 have been updated accordingly.(h3) the revision reported was likely the result of mechanical overload on the posterior medial edge of the tibial insert due to unintended translational movement between the femoral and tibial components leading to wear of the polyethylene.However, contributions from patient-related conditions or positioning of the components to the wear cannot be determined as radiographs and additional clinical information was not available at the time of evaluation.The most probable root cause associated with the reported event of "prosthesis wear¿ is associated with material damage to a surface, usually involving progressive loss or displacement of material, due to relative motion between that surface and a contacting substance or substances.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received reported that the patient experienced continuous pain and swelling, recurrent effusions, bakers cyst, and chronic synovitis with foreign boy giant cell reaction.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b5, h6 (clinical codes).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated/corrected: d1/d2a/d2b, h6.Mdr section codes updated/corrected: a, b, c, e.The revision reported in was likely the result of mechanical overload on the posterior medial edge of the tibial insert due to unintended translational movement between the femoral and tibial components leading to wear of the polyethylene; however, contributions from patient-related conditions or positioning of the components to the wear cannot be determined as radiographs and additional clinical information was not available at the time of evaluation.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated/corrected: d1/d2a/d2b, h6.Mdr section codes updated/corrected: b, c, d, g.The revision reported was likely the result of mechanical overload on the posterior medial edge of the tibial insert due to unintended translational movement between the femoral and tibial components leading to wear of the polyethylene.However, contributions from patient-related conditions or positioning of the components to the wear cannot be determined as radiographs and additional clinical information was not available at the time of evaluation.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LOGIC TIB INSERT IMPL CRC, SZ 5, 9MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
kate jacobson
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville, FL 32653
3523771140
MDR Report Key13944568
Report Number1038671-2022-00309
Device Sequence Number6505336
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier10885862230560
UDI-Public10885862230560
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateSC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K123342
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/26/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/01/2018
Device Model NumberLOGIC TIB INSERT IMPL CRC, SZ 5, 9MM
Device Catalogue Number02-012-51-5009
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/17/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/09/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/23/2022
06/19/2024
06/25/2025
06/25/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/29/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/17/2022
12/23/2024
06/26/2025
06/26/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/10/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-0021-2022
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-