|
This report has been identified as b.Braun melsungen ag internal report (b)(4).Event 1 the complaint is still under investigation.A follow-up report will be provided, as soon as investigation has been completed.Note: this report is being filed for an item number that is not sold in the united states, however similar items are sold in the united states by b.Braun medical, inc.
|
|
This report has been identified as b.Braun melsungen ag internal report # (b)(4): we received two used and empty easypump ii lt 270-135-s without packaging.The following investigations were conducted: visual inspection: the received samples were taken to a visual inspection according to the test method for damages.Definition of the method: damages are visible changes in the original shape or surface of products and packaging caused by mechanical forces and/or manufacturing faults.Nominal: no damage is allowed that endangers the patient, impedes the use of the part as intended (e.G., the impairment of the function of a drop sensor), endangers the assembly or function of the component, impairs the appearance of the component.Actual: we detected no damages or manufacturing faults.As-received condition: sample 1: the white clamp is open, and the patient connector were closed (combi-stopper), the original wing cap was not handed over by the customer.Sample 2: the white clamp is closed, and the patient connector were closed (combi-stopper), the original wing cap was not handed over by the customer.Weight of the empty samples: sample 1: 77.6 g sample 2: 75.1 g functional inspection: in addition, the received sample was filled up with 270 ml nacl 0.9% and was taken to a functional test respectively a leak test was carried out.After opening the patient connector and the white clamp, the pump works properly (solution was running) at the sample.Leakages were not detected.Physical inspection: the flow rate of the pump was tested.Nominal: 2 ml/h actual: sample 1: 3.4 ml in 1 h; 6.6 ml in 2 hrs; 144.4 ml in 70 hrs.Sample 2: 2.9 ml in 1 h; 5.1 ml in 2 hrs; 108.9 ml in 70 hrs.The flow rate of sample 1 is within the specification.The flow rate of sample 2 is not within the specification.A too fast flow (as described by the customer) could not be determined at the received samples.Summary and assessment: a too fast flow (as described by the customer) was not detected at the sample.A too fast flow (as described by the customer) could not be determined at the received samples.The flow rate of sample 2 is to slow.Therefore, the complaint is considered as not confirmed.
|