• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Mechanical Problem (1384); Failure to Advance (2524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/08/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) would not advance as the plunger rod was going above the lens when advanced and it would not push the lens forward.The lens was actually stuck, fused to the bottom of the injector, almost as if high temperature had melted the acrylic material onto the cartridge.The lens had to be peeled off the bottom of the injector in order to free it from its original position.There was no patient contact.The procedure was completed using another lens of same model and diopter.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, to date, the information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: apr 6, 2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification was performed and revealed that the lens was stuck in the cartridge and overridden by the plunger rod.The simplicity was disassembled, and no assembly issues were observed.Dried ophthalmic viscoelastic was observed inside the lens module and cartridge, and the plunger tip was damaged.The complaint lens was removed from the cartridge and visually inspected and dry ophthalmic viscoelastic was observed on the lens.The lens was cleaned and visually inspected and scratches were observed.No additional issues were observed with the returned product.Conclusion: the reported complaint issue was observed during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
1700 e st andrew place
santa ana, CA 92705
7142478552
MDR Report Key13961830
Report Number3012236936-2022-00820
Device Sequence Number14499646
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746596
UDI-Public(01)05050474746596(17)241031
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/23/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2024
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/08/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/13/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/31/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-