• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 CONCERTO NYLON; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number NV-3-8-HELIX
Medical Device Problem Code Separation Failure (2547)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/28/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that the physician tried to detach the concerto coil several times, but it could not be detached. the coil was replaced, and the patient did not experience any injury or complications.The devices were prepared according to the instructions for use (ifu).The patient was undergoing treatment for an arteriovenous malformation (avm).Ancillary devices include a terumo progreat 2.4f microcatheter.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: product analysis #704907405:equipment used- video inspection system (m-78210), ruler (m-83361), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5), in-house instant detacher (model: id-1-5 lot: 9443624) drawing(s) referenced: n/a as found condition- the concerto coil device was returned for analysis within a shipping box, within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch and within an introducer sheath.No other devices were returned for analysis.Visual inspection/damage location details: no damages or irregularities were found with the introducer sheath.The actuator interface was found securely attached to the coupler tube.There is no evidence of detachment attempts using an instant detacher at this location.The break indicator was found intact.There is no evidence of manual detachment were found at this location.No damages or irregularities were found with the concerto pusher.The coin was found still against the lumen stop.Dried blood and saline were found on the shield coil, detach element and proximal implant coil.The implant coil was found still attached to the pusher.No damages were found with the implant coil.Testing/analysis ¿ the concerto implant coil failed to detach using an in-house instant detacher.The dried blood/saline was dissolved, and the instant detacher was used again, detaching the implant coil with no issues.No other damages or anomalies were found with the returned device.Conclusion - based on the customer report and device analysis, the customer report of "non-detachment" was confirmed.It is likely the cause of the non-detachment due to the dried blood/saline found on the device.No issues were found, and the implant coil detached with no issues once the blood and saline were dissolved.No damages or irregularities were found with the device that would contribute towards the non-detachment.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received reported that about 3 attempts were made to detach the coil using the instant detacher.Two attempts were made to detach the coil using the manual method.Prior to coil non-detachment there were no issues encountered.There was no pushwire damage observed after removal from the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONCERTO NYLON
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key13967009
Report Number2029214-2022-00530
Device Sequence Number11803071
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536033528
UDI-Public00847536033528
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryKS
PMA/510(K) Number
K090046
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/18/2024
Device Model NumberNV-3-8-HELIX
Device Catalogue NumberNV-3-8-HELIX
Device Lot NumberB177951
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/24/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/11/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/31/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/31/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/27/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-