The reference (b)(4) has been allocated to this case by rayner.The event description provided states that the immediately following implantation into the eye the lens was cut and that it was off-centre.The lens was left in situ; however, the healthcare facility has scheduled an additional surgical procedure to explant and exchange the rao603f iol.The information received at this stage does not identify which part of the iol was cut.The verbatim report of the lens being off-centre is suggestive of damage to the haptic which could impact stability/centration within the capsular bag.Rayner has requested additional information via its distributor in (b)(4) to facilitate further investigation of the event.The device has not been made available to rayner for evaluation.The rayner risk analysis identifies the following as possible causes of "trapped/torn lens haptic/optic during insertion"; inadequate amount of viscoelastic, inadequate quality of viscoelastic, haptic trapped by plunger override due to fast motion, user opens closed flaps and closes again before use, plunger advanced too quickly, insertion of viscoelastic through nozzle leading to inadequate amount of viscoelastic, user removed injector from tray prior to inserting viscoelastic - causing lens to be improperly placed in cartridge, user removes injector from tray prior to closing cartridge - resulting in cartridge not being clipped closed properly and optic edge trapped/damaged on closure of cartridge.Our review of production records for the rayone trifocal rao603f batch 111180705 showed that all manufacturing and quality checks were conducted with successful results.All devices released for distribution from this batch were within tolerance, met specification criteria and without defects.A review of existing vigilance data confirms that this is an isolated event.No other incidents, of any type, have been received against the rayone trifocal rao603f batch 111180705.
|