• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 18D-LONGER; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROVENTION, INC. AZUR CX 18D-LONGER; VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number 45-780413-L
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/09/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a lumbar artery coiling pre-endograft placement procedure, the embolization coil was being introduced from coil sheath into the microcatheter when it became hard to push.The physician estimated that the coil and pusher wire only made it in approximately 20cm.Upon withdrawal of the coil, it was noted that the coil was no longer still attached to the pusher wire.Physician then attempted to push the coil using the backend of a guide wire (not a mvi product) and flush the coil using normal saline, but unsuccessfully.When the guide wire was retracted, the coil snagged the wire and was able to be retrieved from the catheter hub.Subsequent coils were used and deployed successfully using the same microcatheter.There was no report of harm or injury to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device is not yet returned to the manufacturer for analysis; therefore, the alleged product issue cannot be confirmed.The instructions for use (ifu) identifies premature or difficult coil detachment as potential complications associated with use of the device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: h10 (summary device evaluation).Summary device evaluation: the pusher and introducer sheath were the only components received for evaluation.No indication using a detachment controller was found on the pusher's heater coil.The investigation found the pusher's monofilament with a tensile break shape at the tip which is consistent with the device experiencing excessive force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the damage, but the damage is consistent with the device experiencing forces over specification.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AZUR CX 18D-LONGER
Common Device Name
VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROVENTION, INC.
35 enterprise
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
terrence callahan
35 enterprise drive
aliso viejo, CA 92656
7142478000
MDR Report Key13982775
Report Number2032493-2022-00123
Device Sequence Number5555248
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00810170018299
UDI-Public(01)00810170018299(11)210702(17)260630(10)2107025Z8
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K162524
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2026
Device Model Number45-780413-L
Device Catalogue Number45-780413
Device Lot Number2107025Z8
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/09/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/11/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/01/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/02/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight48 KG
-
-