It was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a 25mm portico valve ((b)(4)) was chosen for procedure, along with a small flexnav delivery system (7912796).During procedure, the implanter aimed at a depth of 3mm below the non-coronary cusp on the cusp-overlapping projection.While the valve was being slowly deployed and reached the 80% safety lock, the valve depth was verified.The implant depth was confirmed to be 3mm below the non-coronary cusp and 2mm below the left-coronary cusp.It was noted that there was severe calcification over the left ventricular out flow tract.During the final phase of deployment, the deployment wheel was turned to the deployment end with audio feedback, but one retainer tab that was not able to detach from the delivery system.The delivery system was turned clockwise/counter-clockwise about 90 degrees but without success.The non-abbott guidewire was then retracted, and the retainer tab was confirmed detaching from the delivery system.There was no tension in the delivery system at the time of final deployment, and the patient did not have an acute aortic angle.The delivery system was safely removed.The pigtail catheter was repositioned with soft wire to the aortic stent of the portico valve, and the aortogram showed the valve popped up a bit with supra-annular position over the non-coronary cusp (ncc) and 1mm below the left coronary cusp (lcc).The valve then further shifted toward the ascending aorta.There was no inference with any coronary arteries.While the patient's blood pressure remained stable, a second 25mm portico valve ((b)(4)) was quickly prepared along with a second small flexnav delivery system (7967498).The second valve was deployed inside the first at a depth of 7mm below ncc and 5mm below lcc.The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
|