• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ENDOEYE FLEX 3D DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. ENDOEYE FLEX 3D DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number LTF-190-10-3D
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 07/21/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature: "three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial." objective: this study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of three-dimensional (3d) and two-dimensional (2d) laparoscopic myomectomy.Study design.A total of 64 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids were randomly assigned to either the 3d (n = 32) group or the 2d group (n = 32).The primary outcomes were the operative blood loss and change in hemoglobin levels.The secondary outcome was operative time.Results: there were no differences in the baseline demographics between the two groups.The 3d and 2d groups were not significantly different in terms of operative blood loss (129.5 ± 86.5 ml vs.140.9 ± 89.8 ml, p = 0.412), change in serum hemoglobin levels (1.4 ± 1.6 g/dl vs.1.6 ± 1.6 g/dl, p = 0.553), and operative time (77.4 ± 37.8 min vs.82.4 ± 35.4 min, p = 0.344).Furthermore, no differences were observed between the groups with regard to other surgical outcomes.Conclusion: the 3d imaging system had no additional surgical benefit in laparoscopic myomectomy compared with to the conventional 2d imaging system.One patient in the 3d group experienced severe postoperative pain that required a visit to the emergency room on postoperative day 10, but it was managed conservatively without readmission.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.Please see the updates in b3, b5, h6, and h10.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Event Description
The customer provided additional information on 14apr2022: serial numbers are unknown, there was no relationship between the olympus devices and the adverse events, there was no malfunction during the study, and according to the information, there is no need for a device return.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOEYE FLEX 3D DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
FLEX 3D DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key14056082
MDR Text Key294153898
Report Number8010047-2022-05981
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GCJ
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340710
UDI-Public04953170340710
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K123365
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/20/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/08/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberLTF-190-10-3D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-