• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INCEPTA ICD; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INCEPTA ICD; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number E162
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Failure to Convert Rhythm (1540); Defective Device (2588)
Patient Problems Electric Shock (2554); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/20/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented to the emergency department and received 3 unsuccessful appropriate shock therapy for ventricular fibrillation and the 4th shock was aborted with spontaneous reversion.The rhythm ended up terminating on its own, with no external intervention.The patient had reported that she had forgotten to take her medication.X-ray imaging and data were provided for review.Additionally, the device recorded high shock impedance measurement, measuring greater than 125 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant discussed programming options and indicated that the x-ray indicate that the coil was not well positioned up against the septum which may be a contributing factor to high defibrillation threshold testing (dft) and suggested possibly a lead revision is necessary.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device and right ventricular (rv) lead remains in service.Additional information was provided, it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022 the patient was seen for a follow-up, an induction in reversed polarity was performed and revealed two code 1005, indicating an open circuit condition.Both shocks were successful but the measurement was greater than 145 ohms.The device was set back to polarity and four dft were performed and were all successful with measurement at 110 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant recommended generator and lead replacement.The patient was referred to (b)(6) hospital for review and assessment for lead extraction.Additionally, this icd and rv lead were explanted and replaced with a competitor.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented to the emergency department and received 3 unsuccessful appropriate shock therapy for ventricular fibrillation and the 4th shock was aborted with spontaneous reversion.The rhythm ended up terminating on its own, with no external intervention.The patient had reported that she had forgotten to take her medication.X-ray imaging and data were provided for review.Additionally, the device recorded high shock impedance measurement, measuring greater than 125 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant discussed programming options and indicated that the x-ray indicate that the coil was not well positioned up against the septum which may be a contributing factor to high defibrillation threshold testing (dft) and suggested possibly a lead revision is necessary.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device and right ventricular (rv) lead remains in service.Additional information was provided, it was reported that on 09mar2022 the patient was seen for a follow-up, an induction in reversed polarity was performed and revealed two code 1005, indicating an open circuit condition.Both shocks were successful but the measurement was greater than 145 ohms.The device was set back to polarity and four dft were performed and were all successful with measurement at 110 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant recommended generator and lead replacement.The patient was referred to auckland city hospital for review and assessment for lead extraction.Additionally, this icd and rv lead were explanted and replaced with a competitor.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented to the emergency department and received 3 unsuccessful appropriate shock therapy for ventricular fibrillation and the 4th shock was aborted with spontaneous reversion.The rhythm ended up terminating on its own, with no external intervention.The patient had reported that she had forgotten to take her medication.X-ray imaging and data were provided for review.Additionally, the device recorded high shock impedance measurement, measuring greater than 125 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant discussed programming options and indicated that the x-ray indicate that the coil was not well positioned up against the septum which may be a contributing factor to high defibrillation threshold testing (dft) and suggested possibly a lead revision is necessary.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device and right ventricular (rv) lead remains in service.Additional information was provided, it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022 the patient was seen for a follow-up, an induction in reversed polarity was performed and revealed two code 1005, indicating an open circuit condition.Both shocks were successful but the measurement was greater than 145 ohms.The device was set back to polarity and four dft were performed and were all successful with measurement at 110 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant recommended generator and lead replacement.The patient was referred to (b)(6) hospital for review and assessment for lead extraction.Additionally, this icd and rv lead were explanted and replaced with a competitor.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) was analyzed.The battery voltage was lower than expected.Using historical daily battery voltage measurement data, engineers determined that this device was demonstrating behavior consistent with a high current condition associated with a compromised low voltage capacitor connected to the device battery.Low voltage capacitors are used in the high voltage charging operation in order to facilitate fast charge times.The behavior of these capacitors resulted in a high current drain, which was depleting the device battery faster than normal.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INCEPTA ICD
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key14067943
MDR Text Key289018124
Report Number2124215-2022-08130
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526480775
UDI-Public00802526480775
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNZ
PMA/PMN Number
P960040/S235
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/09/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/23/2014
Device Model NumberE162
Device Catalogue NumberE162
Device Lot Number102900
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/29/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age19 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-