BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INCEPTA ICD; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number E162 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Failure to Convert Rhythm (1540); Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problems
Electric Shock (2554); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/20/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented to the emergency department and received 3 unsuccessful appropriate shock therapy for ventricular fibrillation and the 4th shock was aborted with spontaneous reversion.The rhythm ended up terminating on its own, with no external intervention.The patient had reported that she had forgotten to take her medication.X-ray imaging and data were provided for review.Additionally, the device recorded high shock impedance measurement, measuring greater than 125 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant discussed programming options and indicated that the x-ray indicate that the coil was not well positioned up against the septum which may be a contributing factor to high defibrillation threshold testing (dft) and suggested possibly a lead revision is necessary.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device and right ventricular (rv) lead remains in service.Additional information was provided, it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022 the patient was seen for a follow-up, an induction in reversed polarity was performed and revealed two code 1005, indicating an open circuit condition.Both shocks were successful but the measurement was greater than 145 ohms.The device was set back to polarity and four dft were performed and were all successful with measurement at 110 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant recommended generator and lead replacement.The patient was referred to (b)(6) hospital for review and assessment for lead extraction.Additionally, this icd and rv lead were explanted and replaced with a competitor.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented to the emergency department and received 3 unsuccessful appropriate shock therapy for ventricular fibrillation and the 4th shock was aborted with spontaneous reversion.The rhythm ended up terminating on its own, with no external intervention.The patient had reported that she had forgotten to take her medication.X-ray imaging and data were provided for review.Additionally, the device recorded high shock impedance measurement, measuring greater than 125 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant discussed programming options and indicated that the x-ray indicate that the coil was not well positioned up against the septum which may be a contributing factor to high defibrillation threshold testing (dft) and suggested possibly a lead revision is necessary.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device and right ventricular (rv) lead remains in service.Additional information was provided, it was reported that on 09mar2022 the patient was seen for a follow-up, an induction in reversed polarity was performed and revealed two code 1005, indicating an open circuit condition.Both shocks were successful but the measurement was greater than 145 ohms.The device was set back to polarity and four dft were performed and were all successful with measurement at 110 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant recommended generator and lead replacement.The patient was referred to auckland city hospital for review and assessment for lead extraction.Additionally, this icd and rv lead were explanted and replaced with a competitor.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient with this implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) presented to the emergency department and received 3 unsuccessful appropriate shock therapy for ventricular fibrillation and the 4th shock was aborted with spontaneous reversion.The rhythm ended up terminating on its own, with no external intervention.The patient had reported that she had forgotten to take her medication.X-ray imaging and data were provided for review.Additionally, the device recorded high shock impedance measurement, measuring greater than 125 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant discussed programming options and indicated that the x-ray indicate that the coil was not well positioned up against the septum which may be a contributing factor to high defibrillation threshold testing (dft) and suggested possibly a lead revision is necessary.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device and right ventricular (rv) lead remains in service.Additional information was provided, it was reported that on (b)(6) 2022 the patient was seen for a follow-up, an induction in reversed polarity was performed and revealed two code 1005, indicating an open circuit condition.Both shocks were successful but the measurement was greater than 145 ohms.The device was set back to polarity and four dft were performed and were all successful with measurement at 110 ohms.Boston scientific technical services consultant recommended generator and lead replacement.The patient was referred to (b)(6) hospital for review and assessment for lead extraction.Additionally, this icd and rv lead were explanted and replaced with a competitor.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The returned implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd) was analyzed.The battery voltage was lower than expected.Using historical daily battery voltage measurement data, engineers determined that this device was demonstrating behavior consistent with a high current condition associated with a compromised low voltage capacitor connected to the device battery.Low voltage capacitors are used in the high voltage charging operation in order to facilitate fast charge times.The behavior of these capacitors resulted in a high current drain, which was depleting the device battery faster than normal.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|