• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH HMRS AXIS PIN; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH HMRS AXIS PIN; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Model Number 6366-9-220
Medical Device Problem Codes Degraded (1153); Unstable (1667); Naturally Worn (2988)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Ambulation or Postural Difficulties (2544); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Date of Event 03/18/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The following was reported: revision (hmrs parts replacement).After 23 years, the poly is worn out.It is manifested by hyperextension of the knee joint and marked instability.The distal femur shows signs of wear, which shows up as metallosis in the knee joint."now after the revision surgery everything was fine again.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding wear (metallosis) involving a hmrs axle was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device indicated that no wear was observed on the surface.There is some damage on the rim in the form of a dent/scratch, but this is likely due to contact with explantation tooling.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection was not performed because the device was returned damaged.Functional inspection: functional inspection was not performed because the device was returned damaged.Material analysis: there is no indication that the event was a result of a material integrity issue.If further information becomes available additional testing will be performed.-clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate the devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to wear of the poly components and femoral component.Visual inspection of the returned device indicated that no wear was observed on the surface.There is some damage on the rim in the form of a dent/scratch, but this is likely due to contact with explantation tooling.There is no indication that the event was a result of a material integrity issue.If further information becomes available additional testing will be performed.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the primary/revision operative reports as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event or Problem Description
The following was reported: revision (hmrs parts replacement).After 23 years, the poly is worn out.It is manifested by hyperextension of the knee joint and marked instability.The distal femur shows signs of wear, which shows up as metallosis in the knee joint."now after the revision surgery everything was fine again.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HMRS AXIS PIN
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key14073866
Report Number0002249697-2022-00513
Device Sequence Number6137369
Product Code KRO
UDI-Device Identifier07613327049930
UDI-Public07613327049930
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K122015
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year1999
Device Explanted Year2022
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2003
Device Model Number6366-9-220
Device Catalogue Number63669220
Device Lot NumberLEABX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/16/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/11/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/02/1998
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-