|
As reported, during a venogram, a cxi support catheter separated at the hub.The device became "stuck" within the left popliteal vein after crossing the lesion.The patient's anatomy was tortuous and calcified.The procedure was successfully completed with a new device.Upon return evaluation of the device 15mar2022, a small separated portion of the catheter shaft remained inside the hub.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Event summary as reported, during a venogram, a cxi support catheter separated at the hub.The device became "stuck" within the left popliteal vein after crossing the lesion.The patient's anatomy was tortuous and calcified.The procedure was successfully completed with a new device.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation - evaluation reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use, drawing, and quality control procedures and a visual inspection of the device were conducted during the investigation.One cxi support catheter was returned for investigation.The catheter body was broken near the hub, with a small piece of the catheter in the hub.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were recorded, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The device history record review provides objective evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.There is no indication that a design or process related failure mode contributed to the reported event.Sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The device is provided with instructions for use which state, ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the available information, cook has concluded that the patient¿s calcified and tortuous vessels likely caused the device separation.Cook will continue monitoring of similar complaints and has notified the appropriate personnel of this event.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|