• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZCU150
Medical Device Problem Code Scratched Material (3020)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/03/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation; therefore, failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint trending for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the intraocular lens (iol) was fully inserted and had to be removed/replaced due to a scratch observed on the lens.The replacement lens model/diopter is unknown.No further information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: patient implant card was received with returned device.Patient date of birth: (b)(6) 1965.The following has been updated accordingly: section a-2 patient age/date of birth: (b)(6) 1965.Section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: date returned to manufacturer: 15-apr-2022.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of the original lens case.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the lens was received with the haptics stuck together with viscoelastic residue (yellowish residue).The lens was cleaned and, the haptics unfolded.Lens damage could also be observed.No further issues were observed with the lens.Reported cosmetic issue could not be confirmed.However, the observed issue lens damaged is similar to the complaint issue ¿cosmetic issue¿ and based on the complaint investigation results it could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: based on the investigation results, there is no indication of a product malfunction or product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key14120791
Report Number3012236936-2022-01005
Device Sequence Number2291737
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474657847
UDI-Public(01)05050474657847(17)240913
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/13/2024
Device Model NumberZCU150
Device Catalogue NumberZCU150U225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/21/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/18/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/15/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/13/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-