| Model Number |
111653 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Use of Device Problem (1670); Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
03/22/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As part of normal complaint follow-up, an evaluation of the event has been initiated by mako surgical.A supplemental report will be submitted when additional information becomes available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: "checkpoint was left in greater troch and removed post op.Surgical delay > 30 minutes.Case type / application: tha" spoke to mps.After surgery was complete and the patient was out of the o.R., post-op x-ray showed the checkpoint left in the patient.Patient was brought back into the o.R., put back under anesthesia, and the checkpoint was removed.There was no intra-operative delay, mps was trying to report that the removal took > 30 minutes.Mps may be able to provide some additional patient information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: "checkpoint was left in greater troch and removed post op.Surgical delay > 30 minutes.Case type / application: tha" spoke to mps.After surgery was complete and the patient was out of the o.R., post-op x-ray showed the checkpoint left in the patient.Patient was brought back into the o.R., put back under anesthesia, and the checkpoint was removed.There was no intra-operative delay, mps was trying to report that the removal took > 30 minutes.Mps may be able to provide some additional patient information.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Reported event: an event regarding other involving a mako checkpoint was reported.The event was not confirmed because the product was not available for inspection.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there are no other complaints with a similar failure mode for this lot.Conclusions: the alleged failure mode was not confirmed because the product was not available for inspection.No additional investigation or specific actions are required.If additional information is received then the complaint will be reopened.H3 other text : not available.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|