• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RONYX27534JX
Device Problems Burst Container or Vessel (1074); Inflation Problem (1310); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/15/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
An attempt was made to use two resolute onyx rx coronary drug eluting stents to treat a lesion with chronic complete occlusion-100% (cto) in the left anterior descending branch (lad).The devices were inspected with no issues noted.Negative prep was performed with no issues noted.The lesion was pre-dilated with a 2.0mm non-mdt device.The devices did not pass through a previously deployed stent.It was stated that there was some calcification observed but it was not difficult to insert the devices.It was reported that there were expansion difficulties during stent placement.The balloons would not inflate at all and the devices were removed.It was stated that a little bit of resistance was felt when pulling the devices.It was stated that no tearing was noted on the device outside the body.A non-medtronic stent was then placed using a non-medtronic guide extension catheter.No injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: an attempt was made to use two resolute onyx rx coronary drug eluting stents to treat a lesion with almost no tortuosity/bending.No resistance noted while advancing the devices to the lesion and the device got to the lesion smoothly.The inflation pressure (atm) was gradually raised to nominal pressure of 12 atm when it was determined that there were inflation difficulties.The same inflation device was used successfully to expand the non mdt stent without any issues.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: four still fluoroscopic images were proved in which images were taken from the screen in the cath.Lab.The images show contrast injection into the lad pre- delivery of a long stent.There is no evidence of expansion of the stent or balloon inflation.There is no evidence of contrast leakage into the vessel.The stent appears to have been withdrawn from the vessel without deployment.The root cause of the inflation difficulties cannot be determined from the still images provided from the field.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary: device returned for evaluation.The stent was positioned on the balloon between the marker bands as per specifications.No deformation evident to the stent.The balloon failed negative prep.On pressurisation of the device, liquid was observed exiting the proximal of the balloon, proximal to the stent.The balloon failed to inflate; the stent failed to deploy.Upon visual inspection of the device, there was a short longitudinal tear on the balloon material proximal to the stent.The balloon material was jagged and uneven at the tear site.No deformation was evident to the distal tip.The inner lumen patency was verified with a 0.015 inch mandrel.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Correction: device return date updated medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESOLUTE ONYX RX
Type of Device
CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14165602
MDR Text Key289733080
Report Number9612164-2022-01528
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P160043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/21/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/05/2023
Device Catalogue NumberRONYX27534JX
Device Lot Number0010512001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/05/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-