|
|
| Model Number |
601-314 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Unsealed Device Packaging (1444)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/28/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.The initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address was not provided / reported.The device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.The product analysis lab reviewed the photos included in the complaint.[photo analysis]: the outer box can be seen opened in two photos, as noted in the initial report, the physician opened it to inspect the device.In one of the photos, the tyvek pouch displayed steady transference from the tyvek material to the plastic seal as expected, however, there are some areas covered by the hoop dispenser where the sealing transfer line cannot be seen.A search within the ecm shows that complaint (b)(4) is the only complaint citing lot ja2077.A review of the coding shows again that only (b)(4) was coded for seal open.The reported condition was confirmed since the pouch seal could be noted opened.However, due to the resolution of the photos, it cannot be determined if the transference was not adequate enough to form a proper seal.With the limited information available, no further evaluation or root cause assignment can be performed.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (ja2077) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.The manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed.There is no indication that the reported issue is related to the manufacturing process.Further investigation will be performed if the original box and complaint device packaging pouch is returned for analysis.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during the procedure, the physician opened the outer package of the 0.014in.X 205cm neuroscout 14 standard guidewire (601314 / ja2077) for inspection and found that the inner sterile packaging was open.The device was not used in the patient.A new device was used to complete the procedure.There was no report of any patient injury or complication.Photos were included in the complaint.The photos are of the product packaging box and product pouch.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report that the complaint product and the device packaging were received in the product analysis lab on 12-jul-2022.The return product is pending evaluation.A supplemental 3500a report will be submitted once the product investigation has been completed.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigational finding of the returned device.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that during the procedure, the physician opened the outer package of the 0.014in.X 205cm neuroscout 14 standard guidewire (601314 / ja2077) for inspection and found that the inner sterile packaging was open.The device was not used in the patient.A new device was used to complete the procedure.There was no report of any patient injury or complication.It was reported that no further information can be obtained.On 19-aug-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that the physician opened the outer packaging and found the inner sterile packaging opened; the inner sterile packaging was discarded.The reason the patient labels were peeled off of the pouch when the device was not used was provided as follows: ¿physician should peel off the labels of the pouch and then open product packaging according to process of facility.¿ the guidewire was returned used, confirmation if this device was used could not be obtained.Photos were included in the complaint.The photos are of the product packaging box and product pouch.The product analysis reviewed the photos included in the complaint.The outer box can be seen opened in two photos, as noted in the initial report, the physician opened it to inspect the device.In one of the photos, the tyvek pouch displayed a steady transference from the tyvek material to the plastic seal as expected, however, there are some areas covered by the hoop dispenser where the sealing transfer line cannot be seen.The complaint device and the device packaging were returned for evaluation and analysis.The investigation is documented below.Investigation summary: a non-sterile 0.014in.X 205cm neuroscout 14 standard guidewire was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Visual inspection was performed.It was observed that the tyvek pouch displayed a steady transference from the tyvek material to the plastic seal, the sealing transfer line is continuous and adequate, an indication that the pouch was fully sealed.Although the complaint documented that the product was not used in the patient, when the returned guidewire was inspected under magnification, it was found that the tip had residues of biological debris, indicating that the device had been used in a procedure.Multiple attempts were made to obtain clarification of product usage, however no further information was made available.Complaint history for product code 601314 (neuroscout 14, std) lot ja2077, found no similar events reported.The device history records (dhr) for lot number ja2077 were reviewed and no evidence of deficiencies during the manufacturing process was found.No pieces were scrapped, and no non-conformances were generated during the manufacturing process.Incoming inspection certificate of analysis for lot number ja2077 was also reviewed, and the peel strength data was found to be within specification.A review of non-conformance data was reviewed over the last 3 years and there were no non-conformances to seal failure defects at in-process testing or finish testing.Based on the information reviewed and the evidence obtained from the returned device and inner pouch investigation, the customer complaint could not be confirmed, and there is no indication that the issue reported in the complaint is a result of a manufacturing defect.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.It should be noted that product failure is multifactorial.The instructions for use (ifu) does contain the following precaution: do not use open or damaged packages.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on (b)(6).2022.[additional information]: on (b)(6).2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that the physician opened the outer packaging and found the inner sterile packaging opened; the inner sterile packaging was discarded.The reason the patient labels were peeled off of the pouch when the device was not used was provided as follows: ¿physician should peel off the labels of the pouch and then open product packaging according to process of facility.¿ the guidewire was returned used, confirmation if this device was used could not be obtained.Updated sections: b.4, g.3, g.6.H.2, and h.10.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|