• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number RONYX35012UX
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 04/18/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
An attempt was made to use a resolute onyx rx coronary drug eluting stent.The device was inspected with no issues.Negative prep was not performed.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously-deployed stent.Resistance was encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during delivery.It was reported that the stent dislodgement occurred during delivery at the lesion.The stent came off the balloon. the dislodged stent was not removed. the stent was crushed against the vessel in the distal right coronary artery with a small euphora balloon.The patient is alive with no injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: an attempt was made to use a resolute onyx rx coronary drug eluting stent to treat a mildly tortuous/angulated lesion in the proximal rca at the proximal edge of a previously deployed stent.The device was prepped per ifu with no issues noted.The patient is alive with no further injury.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: procedural images were received for evaluation.Images confirm a tight stenotic lesion in the proximal rca, immediately proximal to the proximal edge of a previously deployed stent.The mechanism of dislodgement cannot be confirmed from the images, but the presence of a dislodged stent can be confirmed from the images provided.This stent was deployed in the distal rca.The target proximal lesion was then further pre-dilated and a small stent was successfully deployed overlapping on the proximal end of the previously deployed stent.The attempts to deliver a stent across a tight lesion that may not have ben adequately expanded prior to stent delivery attempts may have resulted in the initial stent dislodgement.But this cannot be definitively confirmed.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis summary: the stent was not present on the balloon and did not return for analysis.Crimp impressions were visible on the exposed balloon surface.The balloon folds remained intact.No deformation evident to the distal tip.The inner lumen patency was verified with a 0.015 inch mandrel.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESOLUTE ONYX RX
Common Device Name
CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14186258
Report Number9612164-2022-01544
Device Sequence Number6028212
Product Code NIQ
UDI-Device Identifier00643169557062
UDI-Public00643169557062
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P160043
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/12/2025
Device Model NumberRONYX35012UX
Device Catalogue NumberRONYX35012UX
Device Lot Number0011070054
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/18/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/28/2022
06/07/2022
06/21/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/22/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/17/2022
06/14/2022
06/24/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-