The viperwire guide wire was received at csi for analysis not engaged with the oad.Visual examination confirmed the reported fracture.There was no damage to the spring tip.Scanning electron microscope (sem) analysis revealed evidence of fatigue and rotational wear on the surface of the wire near the fracture site.It is hypothesized that the excessive wear led to the eventual fracture of the guide wire, although the exact root cause of fracture remains undetermined.The material inspection report for the wire could not be reviewed as the lot number was not provided.If the lot number is provided, an mir review will be performed.Csi id: (b)(4).The oad fracture will be submitted in mdr 3004742232-2022-00099.
|
A viperwire guidewire and orbital atherectomy device (oad) were used for treatment of a lesion in the peroneal artery.The 3.5mm vessel was 90% stenosed, with calcification.The oad buckled near the distal end of the crown after one-to-one motion was lost.Imaging indicated the nose of the oad had separated from the crown.Further imaging confirmed the nose of the oad and a portion of the viperwire had fractured.The oad and wire were removed from the patient.Attempts to retrieve the oad nose and wire fragment were made.The nose of the oad was covered with placement of a covered stent peroneal access was obtained, and the physician was able to snare the wire fragment and remove it from the patient.The patient remained in stable condition throughout the procedure.However, the patient's lower extremity had become swollen, and high pressures were noted.The patient required a fasciotomy.Following the fasciotomy, the patient was stable and awaiting discharge.In the opinion of the physician, the specific cause of the adverse event was device entrapment and prolonged sheath placement.
|