• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH-AT ARTIS Q.ZEN BIPLANE; INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH-AT ARTIS Q.ZEN BIPLANE; INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 10848355
Medical Device Problem Code Radiation Overexposure (3017)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/28/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Siemens is conducting a thorough investigation of the reported events.As this event is under investigation, a root cause has not yet been determined.A supplement report will be filed upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported to siemens that a malfunction occurred while operating the artis q.Zen biplane system.The customer reported a substantially higher dose to a pediatric patient.We are unaware of any impact to the state of health of the patient involved.Siemens has requested additional information in order to conduct an investigation of the reported event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Siemens has completed an investigation of the reported event.The root cause was determined to be a hardware error.The investigation was performed considering complaint description, cs reports, system history, and system log files.Detailed investigation revealed that dose regulation on plane b failed as the current-measurement readback did not work correctly.This feedback error was due to a problem on the regulation board d601.The user could and did recognize the problem as the images were overexposed.The procedure was continued and finished on the imperfect system.According to system logs, the additional dose (50mgy) that was applied to the patient according to the system failure stayed far below the given threshold (500mgy) of unintentional exposure (due to either technical fault or user error / carelessness).The system was recovered after exchange of the d601 board in the generator.The occurrence rate of the error pattern was checked.A possible error accumulation or even a systematic error, which leads to a corrective action of the installed base, could not be determined by the investigation.After detailed investigation, the incident is not classified as a reportable event as neither serious injury, death nor an unexpected, prolonged hospitalization of the patient or any other person occurred or could be expected.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARTIS Q.ZEN BIPLANE
Common Device Name
INTERVENTIONAL FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH-AT
siemensstr. 1
forchheim, germany 91301
GM  91301
Manufacturer (Section G)
SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH-AT
siemensstr. 1
forchheim, germany 91301
GM   91301
Manufacturer Contact
meredith adams
40 liberty blvd.
malvern, PA 19355
4843231631
MDR Report Key14191928
Report Number3004977335-2022-22217
Device Sequence Number11901279
Product Code OWB
UDI-Device Identifier04056869010038
UDI-Public04056869010038
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K181407
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Remedial Action Inspection,Repair
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/25/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number10848355
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/29/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/19/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/25/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-