| Model Number |
133S-MX-15-T |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/31/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record has been initiated.If any new, changed or corrected information is noted, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted.Further information from the reporter regarding event, product, or patient details has been requested.No additional information is available at this time.Reason for reoperation: broken device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Health care professional reported right side "during implantation surgery doctor noticed damage near the 12 o'clock tab on the seam where the magnetic port is located.¿ the device came in contact with the patient but was not implanted.Surgery was not completed with a back up device but rather with a breast implant.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record has been completed.No deviations or non-conformances noted.Correct reason for reoperation: "the damage was noticed, near the 12 o'clock tab on the seam, where the magnetic port is located¿.A visual analysis of the returned device identified, white particles in device inner surface and one curved opening at the edge of the insert to shell bond area in the anterior 4 location.A microscopic analysis and leak test were performed which identified, that the curved opening has a sharp pattern and wear abrasion.A dimension measurement in the shell was performed which identified, the thickness within specification.The measurement of the opening is 1.7 cm.Based on the device analysis, the final assessment is: an opening with a sharp pattern at the edge of the insert to shell bond area assessed, as an unidentified (tear) opening.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Physician reported, right side "during implantation.Surgery doctor noticed, damage near the 12 o'clock tab on the seam, where the magnetic port is located¿.The device came in contact with the patient, but was not implanted.Surgery was not completed with a back up device, but rather with a breast implant.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional, changed, and/or corrected data: g1 further investigation (fi) summary: the review of the documentation associated to the manufacturing process indicates that all devices with work order # (b)(4) were released in accordance with abbvie's procedures, and no anomalies were found in the documents or in the personnel training related to the reported event.According to the device analysis performed in the laboratory, it was observed an unidentified opening on the border of the insert to shell bond area which is related to the reported complaint.According to the current risk documents the event of leakage (or opening) in the insert/shell assembly process is a known failure mode and manufacturing process controls and inspections are stablished to reduce the incidence of this failure mode.This event was presented to the capa steering committee and it was decided to open capa 348208 to address the event of openings in insert to shell bond area.During the trend review of all complaints with an opening on border of insert to shell bond area for tissue expander for the period of (b)(6) 2020 through (b)(6) 2022, it was noted an outlier in (b)(6) 2020, and it corresponds only to pr# 2532044.However these events were addressed in capa 348208.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Physician reported right side "during implantation surgery doctor noticed damage near the 12 o'clock tab on the seam where the magnetic port is located¿.The device came in contact with the patient but was not implanted.Surgery was not completed with a back up tissue expander device but rather with a breast implant.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|