| Model Number |
8675322 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/28/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Rwgmbh considers this mdr open.Rwgmbh will submit a follow up report after the device investigation/product history has been completed and/or new information becomes available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to richard wolf by the sales rep/user facility that the inner sheath tip broke off while being used on a patient.The tip had to be removed from within the patient.A replacement sheath was used to complete the procedure.Additional information reported by tug surgergy staff (4/12/22 from sales rep): procedure was delayed by about 30 minutes during delay, the surgeon had to take time to remove the sheath tip that had completely separated from the device.The surgery staff went out and get a back-up to be used to complete procedure.Procedure was completed, patient outcome is fine.Additional information: will the device be returned? yes.Was the device being used on a patient when the reporting issue occurred? yes.Was there any injury or illness to the patient due to the reported issue? no.Was there any injury or illness to any other personnel due to the reported issue? no.Did the issue cause a delay in the procedure being performed? yes.Did the delay put the patient at risk? no.Was there a similar back-up device available for use? yes.Was the scheduled procedure completed? yes.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Follow-up report #1 is to provide fda with new information: results of the device investigation.According to the investigation report - device evaluation, the device was tested using visual and mechanical means.The investigation found: ceramic insulator broken off.Damage is consistent with rough handling or sudden impact with a hard surface.When breakage occurs below the edge of the metal shaft, the separated tip may remain temporarily adhered to the sheath by a thin layer of glue, gradually coming apart with use, making it very difficult to determine when the break actually ocurred.Probable root cause: reprocessing, user error and other (see findings above) reported condition confirmed: yes device meets specifications: no product disposition: repair device labeling was reviewed for patient code and device codes, see below.The user is informed in the related ifu ga-d366 about the visual and functional checks for the device.22222.7 operating instructions.Caution! the products have only limited strength! excessive force will cause damage, impair the function and therefore endanger the patient.Immediately before and after each use, check the products for damage, loose parts and completeness.Make sure that no missing parts remain in the patient.Do not use the products if they are damaged or incomplete or have loose parts.8 checks caution! be careful if products are damaged or incomplete! injuries of the patient, user and others are possible.Run through the checks before and after each use.Do not use the products if they are damaged, incomplete or have loose parts.Return damaged products together with any loose parts for repair.Do not attempt to do any repairs yourself.8.1.2 "shark" resectoscopes warning! danger of injury! incorrect handling, e.G.Fall, shock, blows or similar mechanical loads can cause hair cracks and / or spalling of the ceramic coating in the distal area of the resectoscope sheath.Injuries of the patient, user or third parties are possible.Mind surface changes and ensure safe handling.Do not use damaged resectoscope sheaths, return damaged sheaths for repair.Fig.26 - check the ceramic insulation at the distal end of the resectoscope sheath for damage before every use.9.4 reprocessing procedure the following tables describe the reprocessing methods and processes used by richard wolf gmbh for validation.Important! - if the instrument is used as intended and provided that the manufacturer's manual is followed, it is not necessary to limit the number of possible reprocessing cycles.- careful and gentle handling of medical products during the entire reprocessing process has an essential influence on the service life of the products.- before returning defective products for repair, they must have been subjected to the entire reprocessing cycle.- the user must ensure that the reprocessing process including the resources, materials and personnel are suitable to achieve the required results.- comply with the national and international requirements regarding the validation of the user's reprocessing process.Rwmic will submit a follow up report if new information is received.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The purpose of this submission is to report the results of the device investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
(b)(6) mic complaint reference (b)(4).The purpose of this report is to share additional information received from the user facility.On 25-may-2022, a representative from the user facility informed rwmic that the operator of the device (surgeon) has verified that the procedure "delay (prolong) was only 5 minutes." also, "until the piece broke off, the procedure had gone as expected." the user facility also indicated that the patient questionnaire will be provided when information becomes available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Follow-up report #2 is to provide fda with new information.Rwmic considers this mdr closed.Rwmic will submit a follow-up report if new information is received.Richard wolf medical instruments corporation (rwmic) is submitting the report on behalf of rwgmbh.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|