• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: K2M, INC. REDUCTION JACK; CRICKET 2; ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

K2M, INC. REDUCTION JACK; CRICKET 2; ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 6201-90084
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/01/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Lot kcrv (1): the investigation is still in process; we will communicate our findings in a follow-up report.Lot fenf (1): manufacture date 22 december 2016.The returned device was visually inspected and the fractured tip was confirmed.The device was also noted to be jammed due to threading deformation which indicates that the device was not properly seated in the implant during surgery.This may lead the user to exert excessive force which will then cause a tensile stress on the threading causing them to seize, and, ultimately, fracture of the improperly seated tip.Functional testing confirmed the device was jammed.Device history records were reviewed and no relevant manufacturing issues were identified.Complaint history was reviewed and one similar complaint for this lot number was identified.Based on the deformation of the threading, the most likely root cause of the event is improper mating and use of excessive force.
 
Event or Problem Description
This record is a consolidation of q1 2022 records summarized as a part of the fda voluntary malfunction summary reporting program.This report captures two instances of intraoperative mesa 2 reduction jack tip fracture.In both cases, the procedure was completed successfully with no surgical delay and no adverse consequence to the patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
This record is a consolidation of q1 2022 records summarized as a part of the fda voluntary malfunction summary reporting program.This report captures two instances of intraoperative mesa 2 reduction jack tip fracture.In both cases, the procedure was completed successfully with no surgical delay and no adverse consequence to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Lot kcrv (1): manufacture date 08 november 2019.The returned device was visually inspected and the fractured tip was confirmed and the device was also noted to be jammed due to threading deformation.Threading deformation indicates that the device was not properly seated in the implant during surgery.This may lead the user to exert excessive force which will then cause a tensile stress on the threading causing them to seize, and, ultimately, fracture of the improperly seated tip.Device history records were reviewed and no relevant manufacturing issues were identified.Complaint history was reviewed and one similar complaint for this lot number was identified.Based on the deformation of the threading, the most likely root cause of the tip fracture is improper mating and use of excessive force.Lot fenf (1): investigation conclusion provided in initial report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REDUCTION JACK; CRICKET 2
Common Device Name
ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
K2M, INC.
600 hope parkway se
leesburg VA 20175
Manufacturer (Section G)
K2M, INC.
600 hope parkway se
leesburg VA 20175
Manufacturer Contact
rita karan
2 pearl court
allendale, NJ 07401
2017608000
MDR Report Key14251953
Report Number3004774118-2022-00158
Device Sequence Number4338415
Product Code LXH
UDI-Device Identifier10888857320468
UDI-Public10888857320468
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateVA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized2
Summary Report (Y/N)Y
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number6201-90084
Device Catalogue Number6201-90084
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/03/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/01/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/29/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/27/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-