• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C0315
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/01/2022
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the lliolumber artery using ruby coils, and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, the physician implanted three coils into the target vessel.The physician then advanced a ruby coil into the target vessel using the lantern; however, the ruby coil would not fit.Therefore, the physician decided to remove the ruby coil.While retracting the ruby coil, it unintentionally detached inside the lantern.Therefore, the lantern containing the detached coil was removed.The procedure was completed using seven non-penumbra coils and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from the pusher assembly.Further evaluation revealed that the pusher assembly ddt was fractured.If the ruby coil is retracted against resistance, damage such as this may occur.This damage likely contributed to the embolization coil detaching from the pusher assembly.Based on the reported complaint, the root cause of the resistance could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed a kink on the pusher assembly and offset coil winds on the embolization coil.This damage was likely incidental to the reported complaint.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key14256719
Report Number3005168196-2022-00197
Device Sequence Number12011964
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018324
UDI-Public814548018324
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K173614
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/01/2022
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C0315
Device Lot NumberF111907
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/22/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/06/2022
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/05/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/29/2022
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/07/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-