| Model Number |
15522 |
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Eye Burn (2523)
|
| Date of Event |
03/31/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Iridex became aware of a complaint reporting that the tip of the probe began emitting smoke during the procedure and that the patient experienced a conjunctival burn.The procedure was performed using a micropulse p3 probe and cyclo g6 laser system.A conclusive root cause for this event was not determined.Engineering failure analysis could not be performed because the device was not returned for evaluation.Based on the information provided by the treating physician, it is possible that the substitution of an alternative anesthetic lubricating gel may have contributed to this event.The physician noted that she used more gel that usual and suspected this may have played a role.The manufacturing device history records were reviewed, and no anomalies or issues were identified.The results of post market data review suggest that this failure mode is not occurring with greater severity or frequency based on the number of events reported evaluated against the number of cases performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is provided to update the following: 1)part b: b5 -product problem section was updated.2) report c: is this a combination product - no 3) report d: updates to section d8, d9, d4 4) part h: update to include that this a correction,additional information report 5) part d: updated this section with the udi number.6) part e: updates to the initial reporter section with information regarding the complainant.Note: part a has been updated to reflect patient age, race and sex.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Iridex became aware of a complaint reporting that the tip of the probe began emitting smoke during the procedure and that the patient experienced a conjunctival burn.The procedure was performed using a micropulse p3 probe and cyclo g6 laser system.Information provided by the treating physician indicates that the that the substitution of an alternative anesthetic lubricating gel may have contributed to this event.Although the physician used a gel that is not indicated for ophthalmic use, iridex is not aware of any chemical properties of the gel that would lead to burn.The physician replaced the probe, changed the lubricating gel and completed the treatment successfully with no further complications.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|