|
The reported device was received for evaluation.It was determined the device contributed to the reported event.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.The instructions for use was reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer found that the storage requirements for the material are specified, and the material must comply with provided percentage composition specifications as measured by ash test.A review of the customer supplied image finds a picture with a partial view of the insertion device and the fractured anchor, including the still attached blue and white suture loop.The items are laying on a smith and nephew box.The insertion device, fractured anchor and suture material have debris on them.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The blue and white suture is still attached to the suture ring and the fractured anchor is attached to the suture loop near the distal end of the insertion device.The insertion device, the fractured anchor and the suture all have debris on them.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, additional material testing is not required.The anchor fractured during screwing the anchor in during a knee ligament repair surgery.Reportedly, the device did not break inside the patient, who had normal bone quality.The procedure was completed using a smith and nephew backup device in the originally drilled hole.No further complications were reported, and no additional requested information was provided.If additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.The complaint was confirmed, and the root cause was associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|